• 8 months ago
Roseburn Path: The battle over whether an old Edinburgh rail line should become a tram route

Campaign formed to save “nature network” in public consultation that also includes Orchard Brae corridor option

It must be one of Scotland’s most genteel cycle paths, peppered with signs asking riders to dip their lights and be mindful of walkers.

The Roseburn Path in the west of Edinburgh is part of a web of off-road routes through the capital which were created from former railway lines closed 60 years ago.

But the prospect of the iron road returning in the form of a tram line has ignited a campaign to save what supporters cherish as a “nature network”, which is adorned this month with lush vegetation, birdsong and the scent of wild garlic.

The City of Edinburgh Council is to seek views on whether a planned new north-south tram route between Granton and the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and beyond should use the path or run along Orchard Brae to the east instead.

Council officials recommended the Roseburn option in February, but councillors decided to take a neutral stance pending the results of a public consultation later this year. The council stressed a path would be retained beside the tram line, but opponents questioned whether that would be either feasible, or attractive to users.

Backers of the Roseburn option argued that it will enable trams to run past the Western General, the city’s other major hospital, with reduced journey times by avoiding congested traffic corridors.

The route also has legislative approval from the Scottish Parliament in 2006 as part of a circular tram line, the northern half of which between Roseburn and Newhaven was later shelved. However, the Save the Roseburn Path campaign, which was formed to fight the new plans, described them as “complete nonsense”.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00 [MUSIC PLAYING]
00:03 I'm Alistair Dalton, transport correspondent
00:07 of the Scotsman.
00:08 I'm on the Roseburn Path in the west of Edinburgh,
00:11 where city council officials have recommended
00:14 that it form part of a new north-south tram line connecting
00:20 the main hospitals in the capital,
00:22 the Western General in the north,
00:24 and the Royal Infirmary in the south.
00:26 Edinburgh's serious about meeting its climate obligations
00:29 and also cutting congestion in the city.
00:31 So right now, we're looking at investing in a second tram
00:34 line in the city, which will go from Grantown
00:36 right out to the southeast of the city and beyond.
00:38 And one of the route options we're looking at
00:40 is down the Roseburn Path, which you can see behind me.
00:44 Back 20 years ago, when Edinburgh was first
00:46 started that journey looking at trams,
00:49 we actually got approval back in-- formal approval
00:51 from the Scottish government back in 2007
00:53 to lay-- to bring the tram down here.
00:55 But I think it's right to look at it again to figure out
00:57 if it's still the right route for the tram.
01:00 So both routes have a number of benefits.
01:02 But the key benefit of the Roseburn Path for me
01:05 is the connection we'll get to the Western General Hospital.
01:08 Because what using the Roseburn Path means
01:10 is we can get a good connection down Telford Road,
01:13 actually touching the Western General Hospital.
01:15 And that means people come from West Lothian,
01:17 can just park their car out at the parking ride
01:20 and get the tram all the way into the Western General.
01:23 If we use Orchard Brae, which is an alternative route,
01:26 they would have to get the tram into the city centre,
01:28 change trams, and then come back out to the Western General.
01:31 So that's longer journey times.
01:33 And it makes people less likely to use public transport,
01:35 or simply the tram coming into the hospital.
01:37 So last year, we looked-- we actually
01:39 walked both the routes in between the city centre
01:43 and Grantown, just to look at what the challenges were
01:45 and also the options.
01:46 And what was clear is no matter what option we take,
01:49 getting active travel alongside the route
01:51 is probably the most challenging aspect.
01:53 And I'm talking about good quality walking and cycling.
01:56 I think the aspiration is now we deliver a tram,
01:58 we deliver that good quality walking and cycling.
02:02 But what we've committed to here is
02:04 if the tram does go down the Roseburn Path,
02:07 as part of the consultation, we've
02:08 committed to having good quality walking and cycling
02:11 down the Roseburn Path alongside the tram.
02:14 Just so that-- so it's not that the walking and cycling
02:17 route here has been lost.
02:18 It's just that we're going to put a tram alongside it.
02:20 But a campaign group has been formed
02:23 to fight these proposals, saying this
02:25 is a vital green corridor, much used
02:29 by people walking and cycling.
02:31 If you were to interfere with these trees,
02:33 if you were to cut them down, that
02:34 would release enormous amounts of carbon.
02:37 Not only that, but it wouldn't be able to absorb carbon
02:40 into the future.
02:41 And trees take decades to grow.
02:43 From when-- the point that they're planted,
02:45 they take decades to grow before they can actually
02:47 absorb an adequate amount of carbon for net zero 2030
02:51 to even be possible.
02:53 Some of the bridges further up are pretty narrow.
02:55 And the idea of putting two rail tracks side by side,
02:58 plus a three meter wide walking and wheeling path,
03:01 doesn't seem to check out for us.
03:02 But also, again, it's that net zero thing.
03:04 Do we take net zero 2030 seriously, or don't we?
03:09 But supporters of running the tram line along the Roseburn
03:13 Path say it will make things quicker for tram passengers,
03:16 perhaps saving eight minutes of journey time.
03:19 And it could increase the number of people using the tram
03:23 by 600,000 people a year.
03:26 And that's taking-- that's instead
03:28 of taking the alternative route, which
03:30 would be along Orchard Bray.
03:32 Basically, this is an old railway line.
03:35 Was the North Suburban Railway line
03:37 that came out of Princess Street Station, the Caledonian
03:40 Railway.
03:41 And ever since public transport has
03:42 been discussed for the last 30, 40 years,
03:45 the old routes, which were tarmac'd eventually
03:49 for cyclists, these old routes were designated, basically,
03:53 for public transport use in the future.
03:56 And that can take a long time.
03:58 And it's great that cyclists have been able to use it.
04:00 So I think--
04:01 I would hope that some kind of accommodation can be reached.
04:05 At night, when this path is probably a little not so
04:08 user-friendly to cyclists, even though it's lit up,
04:12 the presence of trams, et cetera,
04:13 might be actually an addition to the safety of cyclists
04:16 at that time of the evening.
04:19 I mean, the other thing I'd say is that the tram is quite
04:23 disruptive to construct in the city.
04:25 So this was a public transport corridor designated--
04:29 was that since it's been a railway line many years ago.
04:32 So to construct a tram on this line
04:36 will be, A, less disruptive to the city
04:39 than building it across the Dean Bridge, if you could do that,
04:41 and then down Orchard Bray.
04:43 B, it will be a lot cheaper, because there
04:45 won't be all the utilities, the gas, the water, the electricity,
04:48 all the other things you have to dig out first and divert.
04:51 So it'll be a lot cheaper.
04:53 And C, this line will actually be quicker for the tram.
04:58 And then moreover than that, this line
05:01 connects into Haymarket Station, which is really
05:03 a bit of a transport hub now.
05:06 (upbeat music)
05:08 you

Recommended