#kashifabbasi #islamabadhighcourt #TassaduqJillani #supremecourt #supremejudicialcouncil #qazifaezisa
Former CJP Jillani recuses himself from heading Judges' letter inquiry commission Kashif Abbasi's Analysis
Former CJP Jillani recuses himself from heading Judges' letter inquiry commission Kashif Abbasi's Analysis
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 Supreme Judicial Council and its Chairman Chief Justice of Pakistan have written this letter.
00:13 It will be violative of judicial propriety for me to inquire into a matter.
00:17 It will be against the judicial propriety.
00:33 So, the basis on which this inquiry commission was formed, that very basis was rejected by Tassaduk Hussain Jalani, former Chief Justice of Pakistan.
00:48 These are not the same allegations written in the letter. They do not conform to the letter written by the respected judges.
01:01 So, today a new development has been made and a new Rukni bench has been formed.
01:06 Now, what will happen? How will the investigations of these allegations be carried out?
01:10 How will it be proved that the allegations made by the judges are correct?
01:13 Will the judges themselves be present in this matter? Will an inquiry commission be formed? Will a JIT be formed?
01:19 Also, will the ISI or Intelligence Agency operatives be called?
01:24 Because some names have not been given. Designations have been given. Names have also been given.
01:29 Will they also be called on the allegations? Why a seven-member bench? Why not a full court?
01:35 This debate has been going on in Pakistan for a long time. Let us see about that too.
01:38 Will this whole process be live? This is also a very interesting element of all this.
01:45 And are the allegations of Justice Shaukat Siddiqui also very important?
01:50 In this letter, the respected judges have also demanded that the investigations of the allegations of Justice Shaukat Siddiqui also be carried out.
01:58 Their allegations were also serious. They had also taken the name. They had also told the incidents that when, when, what, what happened.
02:04 So, would it be better if they are also included in this?
02:08 They should also be called. An audit should be carried out for the last 8-9 years.
02:11 How are judges approached?
02:14 Let us talk about this. Let us also see a little bit about what was in the Supreme Court.
02:18 And what does our Bukla say about this? Mr. Shabaz Kosa.
02:22 Additional Secretary, Supreme Court Bar, Mr. Hassan Raza Pashal. Former Chairman, Pakistan Bar Council. Thank you very much.
02:26 Let us take a little legal view from here.
02:29 And our reporter, Moses Nijaz, is from the Supreme Court. Thank you.
02:31 And Rehman Basim is a reporter from the Supreme Court. Thank you.
02:34 We will take the view from the Supreme Court.
02:37 But first of all, Mr. Pashal, as far as I have seen, if a commission is formed, before that, their opinion is taken.
02:46 That sir, you have no objection that we have started making you the head of the commission or started putting you in that commission.
02:52 I am sure that Mr. Jalani must have been asked first that sir, we are going to do this to you.
02:57 And after that, he must have notified.
03:00 Why did Mr. Jalani suddenly realize that he should not do this? Was there a lot of pressure?
03:05 Your opinion?
03:07 Sir, there is no other opinion in this that surely, Mr. Jalani must have been asked by the government that we want to make you the head of the commission.
03:20 And they have given willingness.