#supremecourt #CJP #qazifaezisa #abidzuberi #khawarghumman #islamabadhighcourt
(Current Affairs)
Host:
- Khawar Ghumman - Chaudhry Ghulam Hussain
Guests:
- Abid S Zuberi (Lawyer)
- Haider Naqvi (Analyst)
- Hassan Ayub Khan (Analyst)
"Ab Dekhna Ye Hoga Cheif Justice Is Main Kiya Tareeqay kar Apnatay Hain" Abid Zuberi's Statement
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
(Current Affairs)
Host:
- Khawar Ghumman - Chaudhry Ghulam Hussain
Guests:
- Abid S Zuberi (Lawyer)
- Haider Naqvi (Analyst)
- Hassan Ayub Khan (Analyst)
"Ab Dekhna Ye Hoga Cheif Justice Is Main Kiya Tareeqay kar Apnatay Hain" Abid Zuberi's Statement
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 Assalamu alaikum, dear viewers, welcome to our program.
00:14 It is Monday and this is our first program of the week.
00:18 But dear viewers, the topic is the same which we discussed last week.
00:22 On 25th March, a letter was written by 6 honourable judges of Islamabad High Court.
00:28 The letter was written in the name of Supreme Court Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa Sahib.
00:32 All the members of Supreme Judicial Council were also addressed in the letter.
00:37 We have discussed the requests in the letter more than once.
00:42 Some allegations were given, some incidents were given,
00:46 that they are being threatened, and they have been threatened.
00:50 And in that regard, they have sought guidance that we should be guided on this.
00:56 If there is any injustice or injustice with us, then how can it be rectified?
01:01 Because in the existing Code of Conduct, there is no legal forum or path in front of us.
01:09 You will remember that letter.
01:12 Then a full court committee meeting was held.
01:16 After that, the Supreme Court Chief Justice met with the respected Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif.
01:25 After that, the full court met again.
01:28 And it was agreed upon that a commission should be made under the Inquiry Commission Act 2017.
01:36 And when the name of Justice Tasaddak Jalani Sahib came forward,
01:40 and the government decided that we have made a commission under his leadership,
01:45 which will look into this whole matter.
01:48 Obviously, a meeting of the Fafaqi Cabinet was held on that.
01:52 There were meetings, and TORs were also formed. We will discuss this in detail.
01:55 But as soon as we came to know that a commission has been formed,
02:00 and the head of that commission, the former Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Tasaddak Jalani Sahib, has been appointed,
02:08 and all the media houses of Pakistan, whether it is the media houses, TV channels, social media,
02:14 a series of debates began on this.
02:18 We also discussed this issue in our program.
02:22 Judge Sarwas Jajjay Sahiban has written a letter to the Supreme Court Chief Justice
02:29 and the members of the Supreme Judicial Council.
02:33 He has asked for guidance on some issues that he faces, some difficulties that he faces.
02:41 He has written in his letter that the administration is interfering with our daily affairs,
02:49 and the cases that he has referred to, and the intelligence agencies have been referred to.
02:59 The point of the debate was that the letter was written to the chairman of the Supreme Judicial Council,
03:07 Justice Qazi Faiz Isa Sahib, so why was it decided that the government of the time was involved in this?
03:13 Because the charge sheet is against the government of the time, against the administration, against the executive.
03:19 Therefore, the Supreme Judicial Council itself should have looked into this matter.
03:25 Or an Az-Hud notice would have been taken from the Chief Justice.
03:29 You saw the whole matter. Over the weekend, debates were also held on this.
03:34 Today, viewers, it is 1st April, when this news came to some people, they said that it may not be April Fool's.
03:41 But this is a very big reality, a big event, we got to see, we got to feel,
03:49 after the letter from the 6 judges on 25 March.
03:54 And what was the new development, the earth-shaking today?
03:58 Justice Tasarduk Jilani Sahib wrote a letter, and in the letter he thanked the government of the time.
04:08 And in thanking him, he said, "Dear Lord, the work you are entrusting me with,
04:14 I do not think it is legally and legally my work, it is the work of the Supreme Judicial Council,
04:20 and they should see this work and do it.
04:23 Let me put the status of the letter in front of you.
04:28 Justice Tasarduk Jilani Sahib says, "I have read the letter of 6 judges,
04:32 the TORs approved by the Cabinet, and the relevant Article 209.
04:39 Because the letter has been written in the name of the Supreme Judicial Council and its Chairman,
04:44 Chief Justice of Pakistan, therefore, to inquire about such a matter,
04:48 which is in the jurisdiction of the Supreme Judicial Council and the Supreme Court,
04:54 will be against the principles of the court for me.
05:00 In my opinion, the TORs of the inquiry also do not correspond to the status of this letter,
05:10 in which 6 excellent judges say that we are writing to the Supreme Judicial Council
05:18 to take guidance on what should be the responsibility of a judge
05:21 when the government agencies and the intelligence agencies
05:26 interfere in the government affairs of reporting and responding.
05:33 Let me read it again and tell you.
05:35 We are writing to the Supreme Judicial Council to take guidance on what should be the responsibility of a judge
05:41 when the government agencies and the intelligence agencies
05:46 interfere in the government affairs of reporting and responding.
05:50 After that, Justice Tasarduk Jilani Sahib says,
05:54 "Either harass or how should he report when it is observed that
05:59 there is an incident with any of his fellow judges or the members of these courts
06:05 that the High Court supervises.
06:09 After that, viewers, at the end of the letter,
06:11 a request has been made to propose a mechanism through the Inquiry Committee.
06:17 Although this letter does not come under Article 209 of the Constitution,
06:22 the Chief Justice of Pakistan can solve the issues raised in the letter as a Supreme Judicial Council.
06:29 He explained in the letter,
06:32 "I apologize for the High Court's supervision and the Inquiry Committee for the above reasons."
06:38 We have invited Mr. Zubairi to our program again.
06:43 The day this letter was written, Mr. Zubairi came to our program.
06:47 He said that, "Since it has been explained in the letter very clearly,
06:54 we want guidance from you.
06:57 Article 209 has been given reference, the Supreme Judicial Council has also been given reference.
07:01 After that, all this will be developed."
07:03 Mr. Zubairi, thank you very much.
07:04 Mr. Zubairi, the question is basically that,
07:07 initially, a majority opinion came to us from the experts,
07:16 but the government's request to make an Inquiry Commission Act,
07:21 is not understood in the context of this letter,
07:24 which was written by six judges.
07:26 So, what is the reason?
07:27 What do you think?
07:29 Why was this letter written, why was this Inquiry Commission made?
07:33 This was a very clear request in this letter, keeping it in view.
07:39 In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
07:41 Thank you very much.
07:42 In your previous programs and other programs,
07:45 I have always said that the results of this letter will be so far-reaching,
07:52 that it should be investigated on the judicial side.
07:58 Not like the executive, because the blame of the executive is on the intelligence agencies.
08:04 So, I think it is a very good thing that the Chief Justice took this action.
08:10 But, we were surprised at the fact that,
08:13 the commission included a discussion.
08:16 You may remember that there were two sessions on the administrative side of the full court,
08:22 and a press release was issued in it, if you remember.
08:25 We got the impression that the judges,
08:28 who were the judges, the name was not there in the press release,
08:31 but their majority opinion was that,
08:33 it should be investigated under the Commission and Inquiry Act,
08:37 which the government accepted, and they took it to the Proceedings Committee,
08:41 and then to the Inquiry Commission, and appointed Justice Tasadduk Jilani.
08:45 But then, suddenly, today, the news came that Suomoto was taken.
08:49 Our demand was from day one, you may remember.
08:51 We were saying this, and they were saying more,
08:53 the Power Council, the Bar Association was saying,
08:55 that this is such a big thing, you are sending it to those against whom there is an allegation,
09:01 a report will be prepared, a judge will make a report,
09:05 and it will be given to the government,
09:07 and the government's will, under that,
09:09 whether it should be shown, implemented or not.
09:11 So, on this, if it is investigated on the judicial side,
09:15 or Suomoto is taken, 184/3 proceedings will be done,
09:19 then if an order comes, it will be binding.
09:22 It will be binding on the executive, and it will be binding on all of us in the country.
09:25 So, that is why it should be done from there, and I think this is right.
09:28 But we had another big request from the Chief Justice,
09:32 that a full court should be seated in this.
09:35 In practice, it has been done, but this is such a case,
09:38 that a full court should be seated and give its opinion,
09:41 so that every judge who is in the Supreme Court,
09:43 has input in it, that what is happening,
09:45 because the Supreme Court is the highest court,
09:47 the judges who gave the statement that this is a salute to their courage,
09:51 so see, they were seeking guidance,
09:54 that you should give guidance, and there should be an institutional solution to this.
09:58 And this is what Justice Tassadouk Jilani said,
10:01 that the court should not be in the 9th,
10:04 but the Chief Justice, who is the head of the judiciary,
10:07 should solve this on an institutional level,
10:10 and this will be solved there, that this is an attack on a pillar of the state,
10:13 that independence, freedom, if this attack of the executive and other intelligence agencies is successful,
10:20 then our freedom of the world will be over. Goodbye, independence.
10:24 So, Lahiri Sahab, Justice Tassadouk Jilani Sahab has written a letter,
10:28 the paragraph has been reproduced, the letter written by the 6 judges,
10:31 let us put it in front of the audience,
10:33 that we are waiting to seek guidance from the Supreme Judicial Council,
10:37 with regard to the duty of a judge to report and respond to actions on part of the members of the executive,
10:44 including operatives of intelligence agencies,
10:47 that seek to interfere with the discharge of his or her official functions,
10:51 and qualify as intimidation, as well as the duty to report any such actions that come to his or her attention,
10:59 in relation to the colleagues or members of the courts that the High Court supervises.
11:05 It was very clear, Mr. Zubair, I will include my panelists in this discussion,
11:12 it was very clear, and most of the people's opinion was that,
11:16 Mr. Zubair, the Supreme Judicial Council should look into this issue,
11:21 or the court should make a larger bench, or a full court bench.
11:23 But it is not relevant in the Supreme Judicial Council,
11:26 Mr. Jilani Sahab has also said that it is not under section 209,
11:29 the letter that he has written.
11:30 I will complete my question.
11:31 Yes, Mr. Kashyap.
11:32 I am saying that,
11:33 he has explained it in that.
11:36 He is saying that, eventually he said that,
11:39 the question that he explained to you,
11:46 I am telling you the question,
11:48 he said that,
11:49 it will be under judicial impropriety,
11:52 if I look into it.
11:53 My work is not done.
11:55 So, basically,
11:57 a judicial response should come.
12:00 No, I am sorry, Mr. Zubair, let me say something.
12:02 Yes, I am coming, I am coming.
12:04 Yes, Mr. Jilani Sahab.
12:05 No, Mr. Zubair has also missed it.
12:10 The letter that the government has written,
12:13 the commission that has been formed,
12:15 which has now died, I think,
12:17 that, yes, it is there, but it is nothing,
12:20 it is wrong, it is an allegation.
12:21 But, let the inquiry be done.
12:23 You are already being prejudiced as a party,
12:26 and you have given your decision,
12:28 what will be the inquiry on that?
12:29 We will come to that later,
12:31 we will talk about this later,
12:33 yesterday, on the session,
12:35 the meeting of the federal cabinet,
12:36 yes, Hassan, you were talking.
12:37 Look, the thing is that,
12:39 first of all,
12:41 Mr. Jilani was contacted,
12:43 Mr. Tassadar Jilani himself,
12:46 expressed his consent,
12:49 after that, when the federal cabinet
12:51 approved his name,
12:52 after that, he said,
12:53 share the TORs,
12:54 Azam Razi Tariq sahab shared the TORs with him,
12:57 he said fine,
12:59 after that, the TORs came,
13:00 after that, a few,
13:01 a specific part of Vughla came,
13:03 who gives a side party line from his side,
13:05 then he made his noise,
13:07 because of that noise,
13:08 a decent man,
13:09 saving his honor,
13:10 went aside,
13:11 this, sir, the thing is,
13:12 when he wrote the letter,
13:13 I asked him,
13:14 I said,
13:15 did you contact him again,
13:17 when he wrote the letter,
13:18 he said, when he wrote the letter,
13:19 not only did he send it to the government,
13:21 but he also sent this letter to Chief Justice of Pakistan,
13:24 and sent it to Justice Mansoor Ali Shah sahab,
13:26 after that,
13:27 there was no logic that we should contact him,
13:29 so,
13:30 anyway,
13:31 here, a decent man,
13:32 who is a respectable man,
13:33 will save his honor,
13:34 he will go with the TORs,
13:36 at this age,
13:37 he will not make a scene,
13:39 the second thing,
13:40 which I want to talk about,
13:41 this is based on your argument,
13:43 your claim,
13:44 yes, based on my argument,
13:45 I have spoken,
13:46 I attribute this,
13:47 I have spoken to Azam Razi Tariq sahab,
13:48 I have spoken to Mr. For Law and Justice,
13:50 ok, I am not speaking from my side,
13:52 one thing will be this,
13:53 the second thing,
13:54 which is important,
13:55 the thing is,
13:56 that,
13:57 now,
13:58 in 184,
13:59 100 motor vehicles have been purchased by the Supreme Court of Pakistan,
14:02 so,
14:03 I think,
14:04 becoming a commissioner,
14:05 or becoming a JIT,
14:06 or some other work,
14:07 inquiring is not the work of the Supreme Court,
14:09 so,
14:10 whether it is on the administrative side,
14:11 or on the judicial side,
14:12 inquiries will have to be made to the Supreme Court,
14:16 so,
14:17 even now,
14:18 the people who are saying,
14:19 that this matter should not be seen on the administrative side,
14:21 I,
14:22 explain me the logic of that,
14:23 I will agree,
14:24 but,
14:25 you will feel that,
14:26 I am wrong,
14:27 I am a fool,
14:28 because,
14:29 the work is not to inquire the Supreme Court,
14:30 it is the work of the institutions,
14:31 whether it is on the judicial side,
14:32 or on the administrative side.
14:33 Mr. Hassan Ayyub has raised a very important point,
14:37 that this investigation is not his work,
14:40 viewers,
14:41 in front of you,
14:42 this is article 210,
14:43 powers of counsel to enforce attendance of person etc,
14:47 this is the article of the Supreme Judicial Council of Pakistan,
14:52 which is very clear,
14:54 for the purpose of inquiring into any matter,
14:57 the counsel,
14:58 the council means the Supreme Judicial Council,
15:00 shall have the same powers as the Supreme Court,
15:03 has to issue directions or orders for securing the attendance of any person,
15:07 or the discovery of production of any document.
15:09 Ok, Mr. Abhishek Wadhi,
15:10 Sir, I will complete one thing in response to this,
15:12 in 184,
15:13 the case of Panama was taken,
15:14 so, JIT was made,
15:16 then,
15:17 the other one,
15:18 the one who attacked the church,
15:19 or even that commission,
15:20 the one who was martyred in Quetta,
15:22 the one who was commissioned by the government,
15:24 the one who was questioned by Qazi Bhai,
15:25 so, the commission will be made for Panama.
15:27 Sir, we have,
15:28 or, we will have to inquire.
15:29 I think,
15:30 you also have,
15:31 I think,
15:32 you have not taken the Supreme Court,
15:34 I have not taken it,
15:35 so, we have a serial lawyer present,
15:36 let us know from him,
15:37 let us know his opinion.
15:38 He is from the party,
15:39 he is the party's lawyer.
15:40 You are not from any party.
15:41 What is this editorial?
15:42 You are from my party.
15:43 You are from my party.
15:44 Let us listen from him.
15:45 Let us listen from him.
15:46 Mr. Abhishek Wadhi,
15:47 this is very,
15:48 see,
15:49 the 210 is also very clear,
15:50 and the Supreme Court has all the historical documents,
15:53 and when,
15:54 the issue of Mafaadein Hama,
15:55 the issue of the whole of Pakistan,
15:56 the Supreme Court can ask anything from anyone.
15:59 The question that has been raised,
16:00 that nothing can be done on this,
16:02 in the case of Hassan Ayub,
16:03 that,
16:04 I have said that the commission will have to be made,
16:05 or,
16:06 an inquiry will have to be made from someone,
16:07 the Supreme Court cannot inquire.
16:08 Mr. Abhishek Wadhi,
16:09 this is my opinion.
16:10 Obviously,
16:11 the Supreme Court will make it done.
16:12 Let us listen from him.
16:13 Yes,
16:14 Mr. Abhishek Wadhi.
16:15 See,
16:16 I do not put any blame on anyone.
16:17 Now,
16:18 I am not saying that I am from any party,
16:19 this is not right.
16:20 We are talking about a legal and a legal point.
16:21 No,
16:22 if you are talking about a legal point,
16:23 then it is legal.
16:24 It is not personal.
16:25 See,
16:26 I am not talking to him.
16:27 No,
16:28 I am absolutely right.
16:29 You are absolutely right.
16:30 The way we know about him,
16:31 the way we sit outside with respect,
16:32 it does not mean that he is from a party.
16:33 So,
16:34 you are asking him a question,
16:35 or he is doing it.
16:36 So,
16:37 see,
16:38 do not do it like this.
16:39 If you call him,
16:40 then with respect,
16:41 with respect.
16:42 No,
16:43 you are right.
16:44 Mr. Abhishek Wadhi,
16:45 I am just saying that you should make it done.
16:46 What is the problem with the people?
16:47 Let us move on.
16:48 I am just saying to the people,
16:49 let us move on.
16:50 If you are hurt because of something,
16:51 let me talk.
16:52 I am not hurt.
16:53 If you are hurt because of something,
16:54 I want to tell you that you are really our friend.
16:55 Let us move on.
16:56 The role in which you are sitting,
16:57 please confine yourself to that.
16:58 Mr. Abhishek Wadhi,
16:59 you have answered my question.
17:00 Yes,
17:01 absolutely.
17:02 I agree with you.
17:03 Where is the credibility
17:04 in 184(3)
17:05 that he cannot do the inquiry himself
17:06 or to anyone else?
17:07 Whatever procedure he wants to adopt,
17:08 he can do it under the law.
17:09 He wants to make a JIT,
17:10 he wants to make a commission,
17:11 a judicial commission,
17:12 he has made it as if it was made in a memo gate.
17:14 This is his right.
17:15 When the matter will be taken up,
17:16 we will have to see
17:17 how it will be done.
17:18 So,
17:19 it is very important
17:20 that what proceedings are being done that day.
17:21 Some other applications are also coming.
17:22 People will form a party in this.
17:23 They will also give their opinion
17:24 as to how it should be done.
17:25 It is not a special group of lawyers
17:26 who are saying
17:27 that these things should be done.
17:28 It was the demand of the whole country
17:29 that the executive should be appointed
17:30 and the executive should be appointed.
17:31 It is not a special group of lawyers
17:32 who are saying that these things should be done.
17:33 It is a demand of the whole country
17:34 that the executive should be appointed
17:35 and the executive should be appointed.
17:36 It is a demand of the whole country
17:37 that the executive should be appointed.
17:38 It is a demand of the whole country
17:39 that the executive should be appointed.
17:40 It is a demand of the whole country
17:41 that the executive should be appointed.
17:42 Whether it is right or wrong,
17:43 it has to be proven.
17:44 People of six judges of the High Court
17:45 have put an allegation
17:46 that this has happened to us.
17:47 The district judiciary has done this.
17:48 The High Court of Islamabad
17:49 has done this.
17:50 The Chief Justice of that time,
17:51 the two senior judges of that time,
17:52 Justice Faiz Ishaq is also included,
17:53 Justice Ejaz-ur-Hassan,
17:54 they have put this issue
17:55 in front of them.
17:56 But nothing happened.
17:57 But the issue is that
17:58 now the matter is from there.
17:59 We are left with these things
18:00 that they did this,
18:01 that minister said this,
18:02 they did this.
18:04 The issue is that
18:05 if this is true,
18:06 then this is an attack
18:07 on our freedom and justice.
18:08 And because of this,
18:09 you and I will be affected.
18:10 Where will we go for justice
18:11 if our fights are not carried out?
18:12 And if this is not true,
18:13 then Mr. Zubairi,
18:14 then is it a judicial crime?
18:15 The Supreme Judicial Council
18:16 will investigate.
18:17 The Supreme Judicial Council
18:18 is not in the Supreme Judicial Council.
18:19 It is of 183.
18:20 Take 100 votes.
18:21 Understand the matter.
18:22 It is 183.
18:23 This is not 189 now.
18:24 There is no restriction
18:25 in 184 that it is an inquisitorial power,
18:26 not an inquisitorial power.
18:27 It is not an inquisitorial power.
18:28 It is not an inquisitorial power.
18:29 It is not an inquisitorial power.
18:30 It is not an inquisitorial power.
18:31 There is a judgment on this.
18:32 Now the Supreme Court
18:33 has its own authority
18:34 to do it itself.
18:35 The evidence should be recorded
18:36 in its own court.
18:37 Evidence is also recorded
18:38 at the level of the Supreme Court
18:39 in 184.3.
18:40 If they do not want to do it,
18:41 they can give it to someone
18:42 under the Ministry of Justice
18:43 or they can do it
18:44 by getting it
18:45 investigated themselves.
18:46 But when the Supreme Court
18:47 supervises it,
18:48 then all their work
18:49 will be under their influence.
18:50 Mr. Naveed,
18:51 can you make a commission
18:52 for the investigation?
18:53 Yes, absolutely.
18:54 Mr. Naveed,
18:55 the Supreme Court
18:56 has its own authority
18:57 to do it.
18:58 Mr. Naveed,
18:59 you have heard the entire debate.
19:00 I will read a small line
19:01 and tell you.
19:02 Today,
19:03 Justice Sadaf Jilani
19:04 has written
19:05 that
19:06 it would be
19:07 a violation
19:08 of judicial propriety
19:09 for me
19:10 to inquire
19:11 into a matter
19:12 which may fall
19:13 within the jurisdiction
19:14 of a constitutional body
19:15 which is the
19:16 Supreme Judicial Council
19:17 or the Supreme Court
19:18 of Pakistan itself.
19:19 Mr. Naveed,
19:20 you are saying
19:21 that
19:22 the Supreme Judicial Council
19:23 should do it
19:24 or the Supreme Court
19:25 should do it.
19:26 And you must remember
19:27 that
19:28 this was the opinion
19:29 that was being raised
19:30 on this from the first day
19:31 that eventually
19:32 even if the inquiry commission
19:33 did it,
19:34 the matter would have gone there.
19:35 So,
19:36 I think
19:37 that a very good development
19:38 has taken place today
19:39 that the Supreme Court
19:40 has taken a veto
19:41 and this matter
19:42 will move forward.
19:43 Yes, Mr. Hazan Aqib.
19:44 Look, Mr. Khabar,
19:45 you keep watching me
19:46 in the shows.
19:47 I don't follow
19:48 the track
19:49 that the entire nation
19:50 follows.
19:51 I give a big compliment
19:52 to the government of the time
19:53 that they brought
19:54 the matter
19:55 to the place
19:56 where it was
19:57 wanted to be brought.
19:58 I give a big compliment
19:59 to the government
20:00 of Mr. Shahbaz Sharif
20:01 that now he has
20:02 learned the way
20:03 to work.
20:04 This was the method
20:05 of Mr. Imran Khan
20:06 that he used to talk
20:07 about the decision
20:08 that he wanted
20:09 to make
20:10 or wanted to make
20:11 in opposition
20:12 to it
20:13 and used to make
20:14 statements about it.
20:15 Like,
20:16 Mr. Imran Khan
20:17 wants help
20:18 from America
20:19 but in Pakistan
20:20 he is making
20:21 opposing statements
20:22 about America.
20:23 Mr. Imran Khan
20:24 wants help
20:25 from America
20:26 but in Pakistan
20:27 he is making
20:28 opposing statements.
20:29 Here,
20:30 the government of the time
20:31 did a very good job
20:32 that first
20:33 they announced
20:34 the commission
20:35 and took the opinion
20:36 of the entire Pakistan
20:37 and also the opinion
20:38 of all those
20:39 who wanted
20:40 the court to decide
20:41 on this
20:42 and the Chief Justice
20:43 to decide on this.
20:44 Now,
20:45 all those people
20:46 who have been
20:47 continuously saying
20:48 in the last three days
20:49 that the decision
20:50 will be accepted
20:51 only by the Chief Justice
20:52 so now the Chief Justice
20:53 will decide.
20:54 All those people
20:55 will have to agree.
20:56 Those who rejected
20:57 this commission
20:58 will have to agree.
20:59 Those who were
21:00 making v-logs
21:01 or giving statements
21:02 to oppose this commission
21:03 will have to agree.
21:04 All of them will have to agree
21:05 and when the decision
21:06 of the Chief Justice
21:07 will be made
21:08 if no one agrees
21:09 then it means
21:10 that all those people
21:11 who were against the commission
21:12 are only opposing
21:13 the opposition.
21:14 Their only purpose
21:15 of criticizing
21:16 is to criticize
21:17 and not to build.
21:18 And in the next few days
21:19 this Saad Rukni
21:20 bench will prove it.
21:21 Yes.
21:22 Okay,
21:23 now Mr. Zubairi
21:24 the next question
21:25 is that
21:26 the government
21:27 which you must have seen
21:28 is basically talking
21:29 about our
21:30 respected
21:31 Mr. Chaudhary Gulam Sain
21:32 this press release
21:33 which came
21:34 you must have seen
21:35 that this
21:36 was done on the
21:37 weekday
21:38 the meeting was held
21:39 after that meeting
21:40 a press release
21:41 comes
21:42 and in that press release
21:43 it is clearly written
21:44 that the trustee
21:45 Kabina
21:46 has also
21:47 approved
21:48 the conditions
21:49 of the inquiry commission
21:50 and the TORs
21:51 according to the TORs
21:52 the inquiry commission
21:53 will investigate
21:54 the allegations
21:55 made by the
21:56 respected judge
21:57 and will determine
21:58 according to the TORs
21:59 whether these
22:00 allegations are true
22:01 or not.
22:02 The inquiry commission
22:03 will determine
22:04 that any person
22:05 directly involved
22:06 in the interference
22:07 the commission
22:08 will on the basis
22:09 of the facts
22:10 presented in its investigation
22:11 will suggest
22:12 any agency
22:13 court
22:14 or governmental
22:15 authority
22:16 action.
22:17 The commission
22:18 will also have
22:19 the authority
22:20 to investigate
22:21 the allegations
22:22 made by the
22:23 respected judge
22:24 and will
22:25 also have
22:26 the authority
22:27 to investigate
22:28 the allegations
22:29 made by the
22:30 respected judge
22:31 and will
22:32 also have
22:33 the authority
22:34 to investigate
22:35 the allegations
22:36 made by the
22:37 respected judge
22:38 and will
22:39 also have
22:40 the authority
22:41 to investigate
22:42 the allegations
22:43 made by the
22:44 respected judge
22:45 and will
22:46 also have
22:47 the authority
22:48 to investigate
22:49 the allegations
22:50 made by the
22:51 respected judge
22:52 and will
22:53 also have
22:54 the authority
22:55 to investigate
22:56 the allegations
22:57 made by the
22:58 respected judge
22:59 and will
23:00 also have
23:01 the authority
23:02 to investigate
23:03 the allegations
23:04 made by the
23:05 respected judge
23:06 and will
23:07 also have
23:08 the authority
23:09 to investigate
23:10 the allegations
23:11 made by the
23:12 respected judge
23:13 and will
23:14 also have
23:15 the authority
23:16 to investigate
23:17 the allegations
23:18 made by the
23:19 respected judge
23:20 and will
23:21 also have
23:22 the authority
23:23 to investigate
23:24 the allegations
23:25 made by the
23:26 respected judge
23:27 and will
23:28 also have
23:29 the authority
23:30 to investigate
23:31 the allegations
23:32 made by the
23:33 respected judge
23:34 and will
23:35 also have
23:36 the authority
23:37 to investigate
23:38 the allegations
23:39 made by the
23:40 respected judge
23:41 and will
23:42 also have
23:43 the authority
23:44 to investigate
23:45 the allegations
23:46 made by the
23:47 respected judge
23:48 and will
23:49 also have
23:50 the authority
23:51 to investigate
23:52 the allegations
23:53 made by the
23:54 respected judge
23:55 and will
23:56 also have
23:57 the authority
23:58 to investigate
23:59 the allegations
24:00 made by the
24:01 respected judge
24:02 and will
24:03 also have
24:04 the authority
24:05 to investigate
24:06 the allegations
24:07 made by the
24:08 respected judge
24:09 and will
24:10 also have
24:11 the authority
24:12 to investigate
24:13 the allegations
24:14 made by the
24:15 respected judge
24:16 and will
24:17 also have
24:18 the authority
24:19 to investigate
24:20 the allegations
24:21 made by the
24:22 respected judge
24:23 and will
24:24 also have
24:25 the authority
24:26 to investigate
24:27 the allegations
24:28 made by the
24:29 respected judge
24:30 and will
24:31 also have
24:32 the authority
24:33 to investigate
24:34 the allegations
24:35 made by the
24:36 respected judge
24:37 and will
24:38 also have
24:39 the authority
24:40 to investigate
24:41 the allegations
24:42 made by the
24:43 respected judge
24:44 and will
24:45 also have
24:46 the authority
24:47 to investigate
24:48 the allegations
24:49 made by the
24:50 respected judge
24:51 and will
24:52 also have
24:53 the authority
24:54 to investigate
24:55 the allegations
24:56 made by the
24:57 respected judge
24:58 and will
24:59 also have
25:00 the authority
25:01 to investigate
25:02 the allegations
25:03 made by the
25:04 respected judge
25:05 and will
25:06 also have
25:07 the authority
25:08 to investigate
25:09 the allegations
25:10 made by the
25:11 respected judge
25:12 and will
25:13 also have
25:14 the authority
25:15 to investigate
25:16 the allegations
25:17 made by the
25:18 respected judge
25:19 and will
25:20 also have
25:21 the authority
25:22 to investigate
25:23 the allegations
25:24 made by the
25:25 respected judge
25:26 and will
25:27 also have
25:28 the authority
25:29 to investigate
25:30 the allegations
25:31 made by the
25:32 respected judge
25:33 and will
25:34 also have
25:35 the authority
25:36 to investigate
25:37 the allegations
25:38 made by the
25:39 respected judge
25:40 and will
25:41 also have
25:42 the authority
25:43 to investigate
25:44 the allegations
25:45 made by the
25:46 respected judge
25:47 and will
25:48 also have
25:49 the authority
25:50 to investigate
25:51 the allegations
25:52 made by the
25:53 respected judge
25:54 and will
25:55 also have
25:56 the authority
25:57 to investigate
25:58 the allegations
25:59 made by the
26:00 respected judge
26:01 and will
26:02 also have
26:03 the authority
26:04 to investigate
26:05 the allegations
26:06 made by the
26:07 respected judge
26:08 and will
26:09 also have
26:10 the authority
26:11 to investigate
26:12 the allegations
26:13 made by the
26:14 respected judge
26:15 and will
26:16 also have
26:17 the authority
26:18 to investigate
26:19 the allegations
26:20 made by the
26:21 respected judge
26:22 and will
26:23 also have
26:24 the authority
26:25 to investigate
26:26 the allegations
26:27 made by the
26:28 respected judge
26:29 and will
26:30 also have
26:31 the authority
26:32 to investigate
26:33 the allegations
26:34 made by the
26:35 respected judge
26:36 and will
26:37 also have
26:38 the authority
26:39 to investigate
26:40 the allegations
26:41 made by the
26:42 respected judge
26:43 and will
26:44 also have
26:45 the authority
26:46 to investigate
26:47 the allegations
26:48 made by the
26:49 respected judge
26:50 and will
26:51 also have
26:52 the authority
26:53 to investigate
26:54 the allegations
26:55 made by the
26:56 respected judge
26:57 and will
26:58 also have
26:59 the authority
27:00 to investigate
27:01 the allegations
27:02 made by the
27:03 respected judge
27:04 and will
27:05 also have
27:06 the authority
27:07 to investigate
27:08 the allegations
27:09 made by the
27:10 respected judge
27:11 and will
27:12 also have
27:13 the authority
27:14 to investigate
27:15 the allegations
27:16 made by the
27:17 respected judge
27:18 and will
27:19 also have
27:20 the authority
27:21 to investigate
27:22 the allegations
27:23 made by the
27:24 respected judge
27:25 and will
27:26 also have
27:27 the authority
27:28 to investigate
27:29 the allegations
27:30 made by the
27:31 respected judge
27:32 and will
27:33 also have
27:34 the authority
27:35 to investigate
27:36 the allegations
27:37 made by the
27:38 respected judge
27:39 and will
27:40 also have
27:41 the authority
27:42 to investigate
27:43 the allegations
27:44 made by the
27:45 respected judge
27:46 and will
27:47 also have
27:48 the authority
27:49 to investigate
27:50 the allegations
27:51 made by the
27:52 respected judge
27:53 and will
27:54 also have
27:55 the authority
27:56 to investigate
27:57 the allegations
27:58 made by the
27:59 respected judge
28:00 and will
28:01 also have
28:02 the authority
28:03 to investigate
28:04 the allegations
28:05 made by the
28:06 respected judge
28:07 and will
28:08 also have
28:09 the authority
28:10 to investigate
28:11 the allegations
28:12 made by the
28:13 respected judge
28:14 and will
28:15 also have
28:16 the authority
28:17 to investigate
28:18 the allegations
28:19 made by the
28:20 respected judge
28:21 and will
28:22 also have
28:23 the authority
28:24 to investigate
28:25 the allegations
28:26 made by the
28:27 respected judge
28:28 and will
28:29 also have
28:30 the authority
28:31 to investigate
28:32 the allegations
28:33 made by the
28:34 respected judge
28:35 and will
28:36 also have
28:37 the authority
28:38 to investigate
28:39 the allegations
28:40 made by the
28:41 respected judge
28:42 and will
28:43 also have
28:44 the authority
28:45 to investigate
28:46 the allegations
28:47 made by the
28:48 respected judge
28:49 and will
28:50 also have
28:51 the authority
28:52 to investigate
28:53 the allegations
28:54 made by the
28:55 respected judge
28:56 and will
28:57 also have
28:58 the authority
28:59 to investigate
29:00 the allegations
29:01 made by the
29:02 respected judge
29:03 and will
29:04 also have
29:05 the authority
29:06 to investigate
29:07 the allegations
29:08 made by the
29:09 respected judge
29:10 and will
29:11 also have
29:12 the authority
29:13 to investigate
29:14 the allegations
29:15 made by the
29:16 respected judge
29:17 and will
29:18 also have
29:19 the authority
29:20 to investigate
29:21 the allegations
29:22 made by the
29:23 respected judge
29:24 and will
29:25 also have
29:26 the authority
29:27 to investigate
29:28 the allegations
29:29 made by the
29:30 respected judge
29:31 and will
29:32 also have
29:33 the authority
29:34 to investigate
29:35 the allegations
29:36 made by the
29:37 respected judge
29:38 and will
29:39 also have
29:40 the authority
29:41 to investigate
29:42 the allegations
29:43 made by the
29:44 respected judge
29:45 and will
29:46 also have
29:47 the authority
29:48 to investigate
29:49 the allegations
29:50 made by the
29:51 respected judge
29:52 and will
29:53 also have
29:54 the authority
29:55 to investigate
29:56 the allegations
29:57 made by the
29:58 respected judge
29:59 and will
30:00 also have
30:01 the authority
30:02 to investigate
30:03 the allegations
30:04 made by the
30:05 respected judge
30:06 and will
30:07 also have
30:08 the authority
30:09 to investigate
30:10 the allegations
30:11 made by the
30:12 respected judge
30:13 and will
30:14 also have
30:15 the authority
30:16 to investigate
30:17 the allegations
30:18 made by the
30:19 respected judge
30:20 and will
30:21 also have
30:22 the authority
30:23 to investigate
30:24 the allegations
30:25 made by the
30:26 respected judge
30:27 and will
30:28 also have
30:29 the authority
30:30 to investigate
30:31 the allegations
30:32 made by the
30:33 respected judge
30:34 and will
30:35 also have
30:36 the authority
30:37 to investigate
30:38 the allegations
30:39 made by the
30:40 respected judge
30:41 and will
30:42 also have
30:43 the authority
30:44 to investigate
30:45 the allegations
30:46 made by the
30:47 respected judge
30:48 and will
30:49 also have
30:50 the authority
30:51 to investigate
30:52 the allegations
30:53 made by the
30:54 respected judge
30:55 and will
30:56 also have
30:57 the authority
30:58 to investigate
30:59 the allegations
31:00 made by the
31:01 respected judge
31:02 and will
31:03 also have
31:04 the authority
31:05 to investigate
31:06 the allegations
31:07 made by the
31:08 respected judge
31:09 and will
31:10 also have
31:11 the authority
31:12 to investigate
31:13 the allegations
31:14 made by the
31:15 respected judge
31:16 and will
31:17 also have
31:18 the authority
31:19 to investigate
31:20 the allegations
31:21 made by the
31:22 respected judge
31:23 and will
31:24 also have
31:25 the authority
31:26 to investigate
31:27 the allegations
31:28 made by the
31:29 respected judge
31:30 and will
31:31 also have
31:32 the authority
31:33 to investigate
31:34 the allegations
31:35 made by the
31:36 respected judge
31:37 and will
31:38 also have
31:39 the authority
31:40 to investigate
31:41 the allegations
31:42 made by the
31:43 respected judge
31:44 and will
31:45 also have
31:46 the authority
31:47 to investigate
31:48 the allegations
31:49 made by the
31:50 respected judge
31:51 and will
31:52 also have
31:53 the authority
31:54 to investigate
31:55 the allegations
31:56 made by the
31:57 respected judge
31:58 and will
31:59 also have
32:00 the authority
32:01 to investigate
32:02 the allegations
32:03 made by the
32:04 respected judge
32:05 and will
32:06 also have
32:07 the authority
32:08 to investigate
32:09 the allegations
32:10 made by the
32:11 respected judge
32:12 and will
32:13 also have
32:14 the authority
32:15 to investigate
32:16 the allegations
32:17 made by the
32:18 respected judge
32:19 and will
32:20 also have
32:21 the authority
32:22 to investigate
32:23 the allegations
32:24 made by the
32:25 respected judge
32:26 and will
32:27 also have
32:28 the authority
32:29 to investigate
32:30 the allegations
32:31 made by the
32:32 respected judge
32:33 and will
32:34 also have
32:35 the authority
32:36 to investigate
32:37 the allegations
32:38 made by the
32:39 respected judge
32:40 and will
32:41 also have
32:42 the authority
32:43 to investigate
32:44 the allegations
32:45 made by the
32:46 respected judge
32:47 and will
32:48 also have
32:49 the authority
32:50 to investigate
32:51 the allegations
32:52 made by the
32:53 respected judge
32:54 and will
32:55 also have
32:56 the authority
32:57 to investigate
32:58 the allegations
32:59 made by the
33:00 respected judge
33:01 and will
33:02 also have
33:03 the authority
33:04 to investigate
33:05 the allegations
33:06 made by the
33:07 respected judge
33:08 and will
33:09 also have
33:10 the authority
33:11 to investigate
33:12 the allegations
33:13 made by the
33:14 respected judge
33:15 and will
33:16 also have
33:17 the authority
33:18 to investigate
33:19 the allegations
33:20 made by the
33:21 respected judge
33:22 and will
33:23 also have
33:24 the authority
33:25 to investigate
33:26 the allegations
33:27 made by the
33:28 respected judge
33:29 and will
33:30 also have
33:31 the authority
33:32 to investigate
33:33 the allegations
33:34 made by the
33:35 respected judge
33:36 and will
33:37 also have
33:38 the authority
33:39 to investigate
33:40 the allegations
33:41 made by the
33:42 respected judge
33:43 and will
33:44 also have
33:45 the authority
33:46 to investigate
33:47 the allegations
33:48 made by the
33:49 respected judge
33:50 and will
33:51 also have
33:52 the authority
33:53 to investigate
33:54 the allegations
33:55 made by the
33:56 respected judge
33:57 and will
33:58 also have
33:59 the authority
34:00 to investigate
34:01 the allegations
34:02 made by the
34:03 respected judge
34:04 and will
34:05 also have
34:06 the authority
34:07 to investigate
34:08 the allegations
34:09 made by the
34:10 respected judge
34:11 and will
34:12 also have
34:13 the authority
34:14 to investigate
34:15 the allegations
34:16 made by the
34:17 respected judge
34:18 and will
34:19 also have
34:20 the authority
34:21 to investigate
34:22 the allegations
34:23 made by the
34:24 respected judge
34:25 and will
34:26 also have
34:27 the authority
34:28 to investigate
34:29 the allegations
34:30 made by the
34:31 respected judge
34:32 and will
34:33 also have
34:34 the authority
34:35 to investigate
34:36 the allegations
34:37 made by the
34:38 respected judge
34:39 and will
34:40 also have
34:41 the authority
34:42 to investigate
34:43 the allegations
34:44 made by the
34:45 respected judge
34:46 and will
34:47 also have
34:48 the authority
34:49 to investigate
34:50 the allegations
34:51 made by the
34:52 respected judge
34:53 and will
34:54 also have
34:55 the authority
34:56 to investigate
34:57 the allegations
34:58 made by the
34:59 respected judge
35:00 and will
35:01 also have
35:02 the authority
35:03 to investigate
35:04 the allegations
35:05 made by the
35:06 respected judge
35:07 and will
35:08 also have
35:09 the authority
35:10 to investigate
35:11 the allegations
35:12 made by the
35:13 respected judge
35:14 and will
35:15 also have
35:16 the authority
35:17 to investigate
35:18 the allegations
35:19 made by the
35:20 respected judge
35:21 and will
35:22 also have
35:23 the authority
35:24 to investigate
35:25 the allegations
35:26 made by the
35:27 respected judge
35:28 and will
35:29 also have
35:30 the authority
35:31 to investigate
35:32 the allegations
35:33 made by the
35:34 respected judge
35:35 and will
35:36 also have
35:37 the authority
35:38 to investigate
35:39 the allegations
35:40 made by the
35:41 respected judge
35:42 and will
35:43 also have
35:44 the authority
35:45 to investigate