• last year
The very existence of VAR has been brought into the spotlight following a series of highly controversial decisions in the Tottenham v Liverpool match.

But what actually happened, and what does it mean for the both Jurgen Klopp's side and Premier League?
Transcript
00:00 (intro music)
00:03 Hello there everybody, Adam Cleary, 442 here.
00:06 I know this all looks just weird and disjointed.
00:08 We're building a studio, that's very exciting,
00:10 but until then it's gonna just look awful.
00:13 Just don't worry about it.
00:14 Okay, so the Liverpool, Tottenham, VAR stuff.
00:17 Everybody's still talking about that.
00:19 But as you of course well know, when people talk about something in football
00:22 for long enough, they start to miss things,
00:24 and they start to forget things, and they start to ignore things,
00:27 and they just plain start to make things up.
00:29 So how about we be sane and sit down and go through the whole incident,
00:33 precisely what did and did not happen, and figure it out.
00:37 Was this just some basic catalogue of human errors
00:39 that could and should have been avoided,
00:41 or was there something much weirder and much wronger going on here?
00:46 Let's find out.
00:47 So, 26 minutes into the game, Curtis Jones intercepts this stray pass,
00:53 it bounces slightly away from him,
00:55 and he stretches to try and beat Basuma to it.
00:58 Now it's clear from the TV angle and in real time
01:01 that he's got there second, he's missed the ball, and he's caught the player.
01:04 It's about as clear a yellow card as Simon Hooper is ever likely to issue.
01:08 Immediately though, VAR are in his ear,
01:10 and they tell him there may be a case for what's called in the rules,
01:14 serious foul play.
01:15 Now, here's the definition.
01:17 A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent
01:20 or uses excessive force or brutality
01:23 must be sanctioned as serious foul play.
01:26 Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball
01:29 from the front, from the side, or from behind,
01:31 using one or both of his legs with excessive force
01:35 or endangers the safety of an opponent
01:37 is guilty of serious foul play.
01:39 The punishment, obviously, for serious foul play is a straight red card.
01:43 So they summon Hooper over to the monitor
01:45 to show him that the position Curtis Jones' foot
01:48 connects with that of Basuma's leg
01:50 meets the criteria for endangering the safety of an opponent.
01:54 It's clear there's no excessive force, there's no brutality,
01:57 he clearly isn't out of control or looking to hurt him,
02:00 but simply this end result, this single frame,
02:04 makes it a red card offence.
02:06 Now, Liverpool have already said they plan to appeal this decision
02:08 because to lose a player for three games
02:11 over simply going fractionally over the top of the ball
02:14 is an incredibly harsh punishment,
02:16 but at the same time, looking at it again,
02:18 there is definitely a risk, albeit a small one,
02:22 that this could have done Basuma some serious damage.
02:25 So the appeal won't be successful, in my opinion,
02:28 but it is probably still worth a try.
02:30 Now, though, the main event.
02:32 Down to ten men, Liverpool revert to their frankly genius strategy
02:36 of playing against Eleven that they deployed against Newcastle.
02:38 If you've not seen that video yet, I'll link it in the description,
02:41 but it's essentially a calculated risk
02:44 of what areas of the pitch to basically surrender
02:47 so that you can continue to contest others at effectively full strength.
02:51 You then use the fact that the opponent now has a huge onus on them
02:55 to push forward and win the game
02:57 to exploit the enormous space they leave in the process.
03:00 Case in point, this space here.
03:02 Mo Salah receives the ball on the touchline,
03:04 Luis Diaz breaks beyond his man
03:06 into the yawning chasm in Spurs' back line.
03:09 His first touch actually takes him much wider
03:12 than he would probably have liked,
03:14 but just like Darwin Nunes did against Newcastle,
03:16 he hits a frankly incredible finish across the goalkeeper
03:20 into the far corner.
03:22 Klopp again showing that no manager on the planet
03:25 has his team better drilled on how to play when they're a man down.
03:30 But the joy is short-lived
03:32 as Sky's cameras immediately cut to the linesman on the near side
03:35 flagging offside.
03:37 This, so far, is technically good officiating
03:40 even though it's the wrong decision.
03:42 The linesman believes Diaz may be offside,
03:44 but they've allowed play to continue in case he's actually on.
03:47 This is the correct procedure and should have led to the goal being given.
03:52 One thing that's not really been pointed out so far
03:55 is why this decision was initially wrong.
03:57 You can see here that the linesman is actually fractionally ahead of the play.
04:02 As he's looking down that line when the ball is played,
04:04 Diaz will definitely look slightly offside to him.
04:08 It's a small human error, yes,
04:10 but one that the officials are currently correctly following
04:13 the right procedures to potentially undo.
04:15 But before we even cut to the VAR review,
04:17 it's really clear from the television pictures that this is an error.
04:20 Cristian Romero's trailing foot is playing Diaz comfortably onside
04:25 and this should be the work of mere moments for VAR to inform the referee.
04:30 The problem, though, is that they do.
04:32 It takes all of a few seconds for the VAR team to look at that and complete the check,
04:37 so they inform Simon Hooper, check complete.
04:40 The problem, in fact, the entire issue here
04:43 is that Darren England and Dan Cooke, who are manning the VAR,
04:46 have completely missed that the on-field decision was offside, not onside.
04:52 They believe they've completed a check to confirm that the goal should stand,
04:57 not that it should be disallowed.
04:59 They only realise their mistake when play restarts with a free kick.
05:02 And by that point, it's too late.
05:04 There's nothing in the rules that allows them to stop the game
05:07 and run the whole thing back.
05:09 Worth interrupting my own video here to point out
05:11 that only 40 seconds transpired between Diaz's shot hitting the back of the net
05:15 and play being restarted.
05:17 In fact, the VAR team were only looking at it for less than 10 seconds,
05:21 which is no doubt where this mistake has come from.
05:24 You might be sitting there thinking, "Well, that's not very long at all, Adam.
05:27 "Why didn't they look at it for longer?"
05:29 Because do you not remember when they first brought in VAR,
05:33 the major complaint, the worst thing about it
05:35 wasn't the decisions that were getting made,
05:37 it was how long it was taking and how much it was breaking up football.
05:40 So every single thing they've done with VAR since
05:43 has been designed to address that complaint.
05:46 They're trying to do things quicker,
05:48 and of course, when you try and do things quicker,
05:50 you do them badderer.
05:52 And it's actually worth pointing out
05:54 that as the discourse around what should and shouldn't have happened right here
05:57 gets steadily more deranged,
05:59 that there is nothing in the rules,
06:01 no power granted to the officials
06:03 that would have allowed them to do anything about this
06:06 once play had restarted.
06:08 Adam Warnock on Sky suggested that the ref should have stopped the game,
06:11 informed the managers what had happened,
06:13 and suggested that Spurs simply allow Liverpool to score.
06:16 It sounds common sense, yeah, but it's absurd.
06:19 Aside from the fact that the managers hadn't seen the footage
06:22 and had no idea what was right or not,
06:25 it would have been the referee literally taking the rules of the game
06:28 into their own hands.
06:30 As a can of worms goes, that's just nuts.
06:34 There's also been comparisons here to the infamous Leeds situation
06:37 where after scoring a goal against an entirely motionless Aston Villa
06:41 who were waiting for the ball to go out,
06:43 they allowed their opponents to cancel it out
06:46 by walking it into the other net.
06:48 But there is a major, major difference here.
06:50 The whole event was instigated by Marco Bielsa
06:53 who could clearly see something was wrong, not by the referee.
06:56 So yes, Ange Postacoglou would have had the power in this scenario
07:00 to do the same thing, but in that moment,
07:02 he would have had no reason to suspect the offside call was wrong.
07:06 Plus, even if he did, tough s***.
07:11 Every single club in the Premier League has had major injustices
07:15 go against them in recent memory as the result of VAR.
07:18 Spurs couldn't believe Diogo Jota wasn't sent off for this last season
07:23 only for him to then go and score the winning goal.
07:25 The handball given against them in the Champions League final
07:28 literally led to a rule change because it was deemed so stupid.
07:32 Sheffield United got relegated because the official
07:35 somehow missed this goal crossing the line.
07:38 I was personally at St James' Park when Joe Willock
07:41 had a winning goal ruled out because he'd been fouled
07:45 before it went in.
07:46 That very nearly could have cost Newcastle a Champions League place.
07:50 Now don't get me wrong, what's happened to Liverpool here is wrong.
07:53 It's a travesty. It's a disgrace, if you like using that kind of word.
07:57 They have absolutely been robbed of a goal in a Premier League game.
08:01 But let's be clear here, this happens.
08:04 And it happens to every team. That's football.
08:06 But the thing is, that's the whole problem, isn't it?
08:09 It does just happen and it shouldn't.
08:12 And it happens somehow with almost the exact same frequency
08:15 as it did before VAR was introduced.
08:18 The only difference is that now they've sorted all the really
08:20 glaring, obvious injustices.
08:23 They've now shifted all the focus and all the controversy
08:26 onto things no one's ever going to possibly agree on.
08:30 Case in point, if there's no VAR, VAR doesn't exist,
08:33 that Liverpool goal still doesn't stand.
08:36 It just gets incorrectly flagged offside.
08:38 Then somewhere later in the game, during the replays,
08:40 we see that, oh, he actually was marginally on in that split second.
08:44 And everyone goes, "Oh, well, linesmen do a hard job."
08:46 And these things, they've balanced themselves out
08:48 across the course of a season.
08:50 But now that they've solved all these glaring issues,
08:52 nobody ever scores a goal when they're offside anymore.
08:55 Nobody ever gets a penalty when they dive in the box.
08:58 We've now moved all of the focus just onto the tiny, tiny things
09:02 and getting every single little thing right.
09:05 The slightest of contacts, the most fractional of handballs.
09:08 Basically stuff that's just never, ever going to be totally
09:11 conclusive one way or the other.
09:13 And when it's not conclusive, fans will understandably feel aggrieved.
09:18 Just look at the Jones red card. It's so, so marginal, isn't it?
09:22 It could be a red, it could be a yellow.
09:24 Whatever decision Simon Hooper just made on the pitch,
09:27 if there was no extra scrutiny with VAR, you'd probably just think,
09:30 "Yeah, that's the correct decision."
09:32 But because it goes to a review, because he's made to look at it again
09:35 and the decision gets worse, Liverpool fans come away thinking
09:39 there's some kind of agenda against them.
09:41 When you involve VAR in a decision, what you are effectively saying
09:44 is that the on-field call was wrong and the reviewed call is right.
09:50 But that is just so often not the case because so many of the decisions
09:54 they're looking at aren't black and white.
09:56 They're marginal, they're debatable, they're subjective.
09:59 The ball crossing the line is just a matter of fact.
10:01 Offsides are a matter of fact.
10:03 But every other decision a referee can possibly make in football
10:07 is to some extent interpretive, which makes VAR as a concept
10:11 fundamentally flawed because it isn't possible to get all of these decisions right.
10:17 There is no right.
10:18 So what you get now is rather than fans looking at one particular ref
10:22 and going, "Oh, we never get anything off them,"
10:24 just because they happen to be the referee on a day when a few decisions
10:27 went against them, instead you've got this team of five or six people
10:32 in constant communication, overseen by a governing body
10:35 that nobody really understands, talking to people in a room
10:38 who aren't even in a stadium.
10:40 So the assessment is there is a calculated agenda to stop my team succeeding.
10:45 Nobody is trying to rig any of the matches.
10:48 It is just a bad and dumb system that is occasionally made worse
10:52 by sometimes bad and dumb people sometimes doing a bad and dumb job.
10:58 I mean, don't get me wrong, allowing some of your officials to do an event
11:01 hosted by a nation state who own one club right before you officiate a match
11:06 for a club that's in direct competition with them is incredibly stupid.
11:11 Really bad.
11:12 I mean, it's just pouring gasoline onto a fire of conspiracy theories.
11:15 But it's not a calculated attempt to stop Liverpool winning the league.
11:20 It's just really stupid.
11:23 So there you go. That's what really happened with Liverpool's little trip
11:28 to the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.
11:30 Not fun, I would imagine, for anybody of a red persuasion,
11:33 but that's football, unfortunately.
11:36 I mean, obviously, let me know what you make of the whole thing
11:39 in the comments. It's just wild as the discourse has been the last few days.
11:42 I have dearly enjoyed reading it, so just whatever you think,
11:45 honestly, get it down there.
11:46 While you're messing around, you should also subscribe to 442, by the way,
11:49 and I appreciate this looks terrible and very unfootbally,
11:51 but we are building something very fun and very cool.
11:55 You don't want to miss that.
11:56 If you click the little subscribe button, that really does help us out.
11:58 It helps us grow the channel, helps us get the kind of money
12:01 and the permission to do fun things, and you'll never miss a video.
12:04 So it's good for you too.
12:06 In the meantime, though, this has been fun.
12:07 Get me on Twitter @AdamCleary, C-L-E-R-Y.
12:09 I've got thoughts about it over there as well.
12:12 The 442 socials are probably in the corner, if I've had time to edit this correctly.
12:16 And until next time, hopefully in a less echoey setting,
12:19 I've been Adam Cleary, and I'll see you soon.
12:22 Bye.
12:23 I'm finished.
12:24 Sorry, sorry, sorry, sorry.
12:27 (upbeat music)

Recommended