Former Law Minister Zafarullah Khan Ki Judges Se Mutaliq Ahem guftagu
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 the private sector. That's right. The private sector is scared. That's right. But Barrister, many cases are not baseless. They are also heavy. But they are also being judged in the same way. And you can also take it in writing, Barrister. The next government will come, but nothing will happen. Now, the hearing of the practice and procedure act is also being held in the Supreme Court. In the case of Navtaramim, the constitution of the bench was legal or not, raised an important question. Can Justice Qazi Faizeesa see this? Is there any possibility of the bench being reconstituted on Navtaramim?
00:29 What is the possibility of the contrary?
00:31 The opposition has been like when the law was made, that 183, which the Pakistan Act says 183, which is directly explained, and there was a principle about that, that the bench will be like this, like that.
00:46 They didn't listen to that. They have done wrong.
00:48 I say that there should be a parliament law, that the Supreme Court should take action and the Supreme Court should decide.
00:55 It is not like that. There should be a law, it should be proper. I am not saying that.
00:59 The close judge of Mandial, Justice Ahsan and Justice Muneeb, they themselves wrote in their judgment that the Chief Justice should not make the bench like 184.
01:11 We want that the very strict jurisdiction you have, should be used rationally.
01:17 And all the judges should sit together. The case of NAB will be reopened, the review will take place. One judge has retired, two are left.
01:24 And one of them has already done a dissent. Now, in fact, the decision will be made one by one.
01:29 One judge who will come, he will go wherever he wants to go. But this is such an important decision that three judges should not make.
01:36 I think this is an immoral decision.
01:38 The decision of 4.5% of the parliament is heard by three judges and two are on one side. And two judges who are accused, they decide.
01:48 I do not understand what is happening in Pakistan. It should definitely be heard again.
01:53 You are saying that it should be heard again. But Mr. Barrister, the decision of the Supreme Court to issue a notice and other legal matters should be issued.
02:02 You have demanded a structure. Today, you have taken the most important petition in the Supreme Court.
02:08 When and how to take Suomoto notices? In what circumstances should he take the notices?
02:14 And you have also said that guidelines should be issued for the completion of the cases.
02:19 And guidelines related to the observations given by the judges should also be given.
02:23 That is, remarks and observations. You have put this very strong type of petition.
02:29 First thing, Suomoto is not in the power of a king to put someone under the elephant's feet whenever he wants,
02:36 to put someone in the well whenever he wants, whatever he keeps doing, do not do this.
02:40 Make it a procedure. There is such a provision in India, Article 32.
02:46 It has been since 1950. Since 1950, it has been used 50 times.
02:51 We have it since 1973. One Chief Justice used it 50 times in a year.
02:58 Is this a way? A woman has been given a bottle of alcohol, and there is Suomoto.
03:03 A man is building a hospital, and there is Suomoto.
03:07 Satya Nath was building such a big hospital in Suomoto, and it was destroyed in the war.
03:12 Because his brother was killed. He is building a dam.
03:16 Do judges build dams or engineers?
03:19 He had destroyed it. I have said this.
03:22 Okay, Mian Nawaz Shiv was disqualified in this. No appeal or anything.
03:26 The biggest thing is that there is no appeal in Suomoto.
03:29 I have written in it, look, it is our belief.
03:32 There is no innocent except for the prophets.
03:34 Come on, our Shia friends say that the Imam is innocent. I agree.
03:37 In our belief, these classes are innocent. The judge is not innocent. The judge can make a mistake.
03:42 That is why we say, listen to one judge, listen to the next appeal. Listen to the next appeal.
03:46 Now you sit by yourself. You become a prosecutor yourself.
03:50 You become a judge yourself. This work should be finished. Listen to the entire court.
03:53 And first tell us that we will listen to these cases, we will not listen to them. On these parameters.
03:58 You talked about other observations.
04:00 After the Supreme Court, the judge sits there and makes such comments.
04:04 He does not do the worst.
04:07 He insults lawyers, insults officers, insults parliamentarians.
04:12 There was a judge there, his name was Azmat Saeed.
04:16 He probably said in the court in 2013 or 2014,
04:20 there was some other case.
04:23 He says there, publicly,
04:26 tell the Prime Minister that the seat is vacant in Adiala.
04:30 I will send it there. Nawaz Sharif sir called me.
04:34 I will tell you today. It is a public matter.
04:36 Nawaz Sharif called me. We wrote a letter to Nawaz Sharif.
04:39 Nawaz Sharif wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of Pakistan.
04:43 That I am not a party. My name is not in it.
04:46 What is the need for a judge to say such a useless thing? We have not received an answer yet.
04:51 I have seen a journalist, Saleh Zafar,
04:54 being so insulted in front of a bank of the Supreme Court.
05:00 Believe me, I have not read such insults in any abusive book.
05:07 I was also hugged once.
05:09 I was with the lawyer of Mian Nawaz Sharif, Mian sir.
05:12 He did not let me speak. This should not be done.
05:15 Why insult the lawyers, the citizens, the police?
05:18 Why? What law is this? What is the law?
05:21 I have also written this. I will tell you more.
05:24 There are 34 rights under the UN Charter of Pakistan.
05:29 29 out of 29 rights are qualified, controlled.
05:33 Right to life is controlled. How? I will kill, I will be killed.
05:36 There is one such right in the whole world that you cannot touch.
05:41 Not less, that is the right to dignity.
05:44 You cannot disrespect a rapist, you cannot disrespect a murderer.
05:48 You can hang him according to the law.
05:51 You cannot take him out of the house.
05:53 People are standing in the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
05:55 Their right to dignity is affected.
05:57 And they are talking, talking, talking.
05:59 They are talking against one party, they are talking against the other party.
06:02 My brother, this is something to be done.
06:05 It is said that be silent like a judge.
06:07 Not silent, but judge.
06:08 It is in the judgment that these are hermits, judges.
06:10 I have requested that you should ask questions.
06:13 You should not do such running commentary in the media, like cricket.
06:17 I am asking you, is it your right?
06:19 I will do this, I will do that.
06:22 They are doing it for fun.
06:23 If this is your hobby, then leave it and do it for fun.
06:26 It is the right of the fans to talk like this.
06:29 So this is what I requested.
06:30 How do you make a bench?
06:31 Yes, I am coming to this, sir.
06:32 I made a bench.
06:33 I will come to the benches, sir.
06:36 You raised an important question on the formation of benches.
06:38 Although, in the 18th amendment, the decision was made by the Judicial Commission.
06:42 The seniority of its members versus competency is a debate.
06:46 Age old in the country, of course.
06:47 What is your position?
06:49 What do you want?
06:50 How should the judges be appointed?
06:52 My position is that there is only one person who appoints the Chief Justice.
06:58 That's it.
06:59 There is no one else.
07:01 He does not listen to anyone.
07:02 He brings his own bench.
07:03 He brings the fifth number.
07:05 Why?
07:06 When the summary comes in front of the Prime Minister,
07:09 he appoints the fourth number.
07:12 He asks why he did not appoint the first number.
07:14 Why do they appoint the fifth number?
07:15 I have said this.
07:16 You are a judge.
07:18 And the judges have also said, and the Pakistan Bar Council is also saying,
07:20 you make a criteria.
07:22 How?
07:23 Like when you do an interview in the 17th, 18th grade,
07:26 what is the criteria?
07:28 Have you studied?
07:29 Is Pakistan's education immediate?
07:31 How much is written in the book?
07:32 How much research has been done?
07:33 How many cases have been decided?
07:35 How many reported cases do you have?
07:36 Do you pay taxes or not?
07:38 Have you ever seen the court?
07:40 The lawyer has.
07:41 Whom you are making a judge.
07:43 All these things should have a mathematical number.
07:46 Everyone on the net should know,
07:48 before applying, that I have such numbers.
07:51 Do public hearing.
07:52 And the second thing I said,
07:54 women are not allowed to be judges.
07:56 Now there are two.
07:57 Why?
07:58 Why do not they let half-dwelling women come?
08:00 Absolutely.
08:01 There is not a single judge of our minorities.
08:02 Bhagwan Das was a wonderful judge.
08:04 We do not have Christians in our country.
08:06 There are no Hindus.
08:07 Why do not they make judges?
08:09 I have also written this.
08:11 You do not get judges of some areas.
08:13 There is one judge of South Punjab.
08:15 One comes in 50 years.
08:16 Why?
08:17 All the judges of Lahore are made.
08:18 Why?
08:19 There are regions in Pakistan.
08:22 Why do not judges of those regions become judges?
08:24 The whole world.
08:25 It is written in the International Court of Justice.
08:27 Equitable representation of the various geographic zones of the world.
08:32 Why do not you do it in Pakistan?
08:34 There was a time when all the judges of Lahore were of the same nation.
08:41 Do not do this.
08:43 And take an open objection from people.
08:47 I have to be the judge.
08:49 I have the right to tell him that I am a thief.
08:51 This is the representation of civil society.
08:52 He has cheated in such a work.
08:53 Open the whole system.
08:55 Put mathematical numbers.
08:57 And keep the numbers of interviews and interviews less.
08:59 So that whoever comes, comes in front of me.
09:02 The Parliamentary Committee has been made.
09:04 The Judicial Commission does everything.
09:06 Because in the time of Chaudhary Ustakhar, he was forced to pass the 19th amendment of the Parliament.
09:12 The Parliament did not give the vote.
09:14 I agree.
09:15 Okay, when the time comes, we will change it.
09:17 Therefore, the wearing of the stick should be in front of everyone.
09:21 on it.