Outlook Business | Leading Edge 2018 - Corporate Karma

  • last year
Editor, N Mahalakshmi, engages in a lively discussion on leadership lessons from the Mahabharata with Abhay Aima of HDFC Bank, Nilesh Shah of Kotak Mahindra AMC, Eika Banerjee of Future Learning and writer, Krishna Udayasankar

Log on to leadingedge.outlookbusiness.com for more

Music: Hooksounds

#CorporateKarma #LeadingEdge2018 #Business #OutlookBusiness #OutlookMagazine #OutlookGroup
Transcript
00:00 [MUSIC PLAYING]
00:03 So great, I don't have a question list.
00:15 And we are going to just develop this whole conversation
00:18 as we go along.
00:20 The idea was to create a discussion around,
00:26 are there lessons from the Mahabharata?
00:29 And to clarify, this is the Amar Chitra Katha
00:32 version of the Mahabharata, because Krishna just
00:34 educated me that which version of Mahabharata
00:37 are we going to talk about?
00:38 I don't know any other version of Mahabharata.
00:41 The only version I know is Amar Chitra Katha,
00:43 and I think a whole bunch of people
00:45 out here may not know the different versions
00:47 of Mahabharata.
00:48 So based on the Amar Chitra Katha version of Mahabharata,
00:52 are there some serious business lessons?
00:56 Are there analogies to the corporate world?
01:00 And what can we truly learn?
01:02 So one leading question is that you
01:08 have these various characters in Mahabharata
01:11 who can be conceived in leadership roles,
01:17 right from Krishna, the strategist,
01:19 to the Yudhishtira, the righteous leader,
01:23 to Duryodhana, who was aggressive, according to me,
01:27 should have been a good leader.
01:28 There was nothing that went against him,
01:30 except that history portrays him to be a bad guy.
01:34 There is Bhishma Pitamah, who is like a group patriarch,
01:39 unwilling to let go, and so on and so forth.
01:42 So look at all these characters and see
01:44 who could be the best role model for a modern-day CEO.
01:49 So with that, Krishna, your interpretation
01:51 of the various characters and how do you relate to them?
01:54 Thank you for that very interesting question,
01:58 first of all.
01:59 And it's always difficult to pick
02:01 who should have been the leader, because I
02:03 think the beauty of the Mahabharata
02:04 is that it raises more questions than it gives answers.
02:09 And it is we in this time and age
02:11 who are left to try and find our answers,
02:14 even construct answers that are relevant to us
02:17 from the legacy that has been left to us in terms of what
02:20 you would call it myth or history.
02:23 With that preface, I would say, in fact, my pick,
02:27 if I had one vote for who was the best
02:29 leader of the lot in the entire character gamut of the Mahabharata,
02:33 I would say it was Ashwathama.
02:35 OK.
02:37 Please portray Ashwathama for us.
02:39 Ashwathama, even in your Amar Chitra Katha version,
02:42 or any other version, is considered a warrior,
02:45 a scorner, a man who has done absolutely no wrong,
02:50 till supposedly that one night he goes around murdering people.
02:54 One disclaimer, she has an entire book on Ashwathama.
02:58 Just one?
03:00 Yeah, so I mean, Miyakalpa, he's a favorite,
03:03 so I am rooting for my favorite here.
03:05 But I think that the very fact that we
03:09 can debate whether Ashwathama was leadership material or not
03:13 brings us to a question of what is a leader?
03:16 Is it just somebody who's not done wrong?
03:19 Is it somebody who spoke up at the right time
03:21 when wrong was being done?
03:24 Or is it somebody who used a broader environment,
03:28 a competitive and very competitive environment,
03:31 if you were to follow a business term,
03:32 to try and make their way ahead?
03:35 So I think that brings us to a very fundamental question of whom
03:38 you would consider a leader before you even pick one and say,
03:42 this is the best leader.
03:43 Every one of them portrays a very different leadership
03:46 quality, but every one of them also
03:48 brings with it the flip side, which
03:50 is that the best of leaders have certain flaws.
03:54 So yeah, I think it lends itself to a very interesting
03:57 discussion on who would we pick as a leader and why.
04:01 So that's my personal favorite.
04:03 But yeah, hey, I have a vested interest.
04:06 Even before that, what would we consider a good leader
04:09 is something we probably need to think about.
04:11 And I wish we can do that.
04:14 Who is a good leader?
04:15 And you can then look at the various characters
04:18 and say, who is the right role model from Mahabharata
04:21 to be a good-- to mimic from?
04:24 I work in Kotak Bank.
04:26 So I consider Uday Kotak as a good leader.
04:30 When I joined Kotak Bank, I asked Uday,
04:34 what is his philosophy?
04:36 And he combined Ramayan and Mahabharata.
04:40 He said there are two by two quotient.
04:43 One, a Ram quotient, where your goals are good, righteous,
04:49 and your means to achieve that goals are also righteous.
04:53 The other one is Krishna quotient,
04:55 where your goals are obviously righteous.
04:58 But in terms of means, you are street smart.
05:01 You take certain liberties which Ram will never take.
05:05 On the other end, there are other two quotients,
05:08 a Ravan quotient, where goals and means both are adharma.
05:14 And then there is Duryodhana quotient,
05:15 where goals sometimes are reasonable,
05:19 but means are always disastrous.
05:23 Now, if you're running business, try to be in Ram quotient.
05:26 That will build business over a longer period of time.
05:30 But since you're operating in India, once in a while,
05:33 if you have to go to Krishna quotient, it is fine.
05:36 But never ever be in Duryodhana quotient,
05:38 never ever be in Ravan quotient.
05:41 I think that philosophy defines Kotak Mahindra group.
05:45 It has worked well for Uday Kotak and Kotak Mahindra group.
05:48 And to some extent, we have copied that in Kotak Mahindra
05:52 mutual fund, and it has worked well for us.
05:56 So why did we have to get Ram into this at all?
05:59 I mean, is Krishna not enough?
06:02 Ram is Maryada Purushottam.
06:05 Ram is the ideal.
06:08 He always lived within a cage, within the restrictions given
06:13 by the society, by the dharma of that time.
06:18 Krishna lived outside the cage.
06:22 He could always take a shortcut, a smart way,
06:25 a street smart way.
06:28 But Ram was Maryada Purushottam.
06:30 And I think we need both Ram and Krishna together,
06:34 rather than trying to be only Ram or trying to be only Krishna,
06:39 especially in current environment,
06:41 where your goal should be righteous.
06:44 But sometimes to achieve those goals,
06:46 you need to take a street smart view,
06:48 rather than just walking on the straight lane.
06:52 Sure.
06:54 Who's your favorite leader character in Mahabharata,
06:57 and what is your idea of a leader?
06:59 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
07:00 [LAUGHTER]
07:01 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
07:03 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
07:06 You know, we are holding them from the--
07:08 Bar.
07:09 Bar.
07:10 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
07:13 No, I think at various stages in life,
07:18 various people can lead you to where you want to go,
07:22 if you choose to.
07:23 So the choice is yours.
07:26 I don't think you can actually pinpoint and say, OK,
07:29 this is my ultimate goal or ultimate person
07:34 that I need to follow--
07:35 Ram, Krishna, whoever it is.
07:39 The key to life is that you are what you are,
07:44 and you know what you want to be.
07:47 And along the way, if someone helps you in their journey,
07:51 which is fine.
07:52 But I don't think the ultimate aim
07:57 should be to become the Krishna or Ram or any one of these.
08:03 Those are just guidelines.
08:04 Those are just things that you need to take support from.
08:09 But I think it was Zen, we said that if you see your parents,
08:13 kill them.
08:15 If you see Buddha next, kill him too.
08:18 Because everyone has the capability
08:19 of becoming a Ram, Buddha, or Krishna.
08:23 So the moment you idealize someone,
08:27 the moment you say that this is what I--
08:31 subconsciously or consciously, you're
08:33 trying to be that, which I think is unfair to your being.
08:37 So you are an individual, and you
08:41 will be Abhay or Nilesh or Krishna or whoever,
08:46 or Mahalakshmi or whoever wants to be.
08:48 And I think that's more important.
08:50 I don't think it's important that you
08:53 need to give so much of emphasis that you end up--
08:57 -No, but you always look for role models, right?
08:59 You say that, OK, this is a good model to follow.
09:02 I mean, in everything we follow that in business,
09:04 you look at business models that work.
09:07 For everything, you look for some inspiration,
09:09 so you get a framework in terms of how can this be structured.
09:13 -If it's a support, it is fine.
09:16 You should not become that, because then you
09:19 are denying yourself the possibility
09:21 of becoming a Buddha.
09:23 I think each one of us has a capability
09:25 of becoming a Buddha.
09:28 I think there was this-- I was listening to this song
09:34 from one of the Pakistani singers,
09:37 and it says, [SPEAKING HINDI]
09:46 So I have the capability of becoming Shankar.
09:49 I think each one of us has.
09:51 So as long as you're using it as a support
09:56 and it's not overwhelming enough for you to-- because then you're
10:01 just a clone, and then you're just-- I think each one of us,
10:04 I don't think we should miss out on that.
10:05 It would be unfair to life.
10:06 It would be unfair to you.
10:08 It would be unfair to you as a human being.
10:10 So each one of us has the capability
10:12 of becoming a Shankar or a Buddha or a Ram or a Krishna
10:15 or a Dishonest.
10:18 OK.
10:19 Your favorite character, please don't go on about lines.
10:22 So given that I already work in the space of both leadership
10:28 and ancient wisdom, it's probably a biased question,
10:32 as far as I'm concerned.
10:35 So let me start with Mahabharata.
10:37 So the Mahabharata itself, we always
10:38 say [SPEAKING HINDI]
10:40 So starting with that premise, I
10:48 don't think it's just Mahabharata characters
10:50 that we should talk about.
10:53 And as far as leadership is concerned,
10:55 I believe that there are-- and I am-- and Ilesh, pardon me,
11:00 but I'm very against binary frameworks.
11:02 They make me very, very uncomfortable,
11:04 linearities and binaries.
11:06 So I believe that [SPEAKING HINDI]
11:12 So you're the creator, the classic startup guy.
11:16 [SPEAKING HINDI]
11:18 The preserver, the builder, somebody
11:20 who looks at a business at x and says, [SPEAKING HINDI]
11:25 Who's the disruptor, the destroyer,
11:26 the turnaround artist who looks at a business as it is
11:28 and says, no, it's fine where it is,
11:30 but it needs an orbit change.
11:31 Can I break it down into pieces and rebuild it?
11:33 By the way, that is also one thing
11:35 that [INAUDIBLE] often uses.
11:38 There's Brahma.
11:38 Every organization must have a Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva.
11:41 Absolutely.
11:42 Absolutely.
11:42 So to me, it's a function of [SPEAKING HINDI]
11:48 So if the organization is in its founding stages,
11:51 you need to start a business, you probably
11:52 need somebody with a Brahma core.
11:54 Otherwise, you need somebody-- business has been built up.
11:56 You need somebody to take it to the next level.
11:57 It's a Vishnu.
11:58 And you're struggling with a business.
12:00 You know that it logically makes sense,
12:01 but how do we reinvent the business?
12:03 It's a Shiva.
12:05 Coming back to the Mahabharata, I
12:09 don't think I have a favorite leader there.
12:12 But yeah, predictably, my heart beats for Krishna,
12:16 and it bleeds for Karna.
12:18 But yeah, between the two of them,
12:20 I don't think there are--
12:21 so leadership lessons are more in terms of lessons
12:23 to be learned than role models to be emulated in the Mahabharata
12:28 is how I believe.
12:29 I also believe there are qualities in all bad.
12:31 So I don't think there is a superhero there.
12:34 I think everybody is a shade of gray somewhere,
12:37 and what do we want to pick out of it?
12:39 So I'm not about blacks and whites and emulations,
12:41 but yeah, so Krishna at one end of the continuum,
12:44 and Karna at the other.
12:47 You can probably bring on business lessons
12:53 for leaders from Mahabharata.
12:55 And also, you talked about competition, strategy.
12:58 Maybe you can pick on two or three of those ideas
13:01 and tell us some lessons and side stories.
13:05 Possibly.
13:05 Yeah, I'm just going to share this thought that's
13:07 running in my-- sorry, I don't think I need this, right?
13:10 I'm going to share this thought that's
13:12 running in my mind from what Aika said, which is the whole idea
13:14 of old progression.
13:17 And the moment she talks about Krishna,
13:19 the immediate thing that comes to my head
13:21 is the whole idea of Schumpeterian creative
13:24 destruction from a business cycle perspective, where
13:27 you see Krishna as somebody who understands
13:30 that the status quo of how things are,
13:33 or the entire market structure, is not at its optimal, most
13:38 efficient level.
13:39 So some degree of destruction, followed by rejuvenation,
13:44 followed by a completely new systemic order,
13:47 is required for the market.
13:49 Or if we think of a kingdom as an economic unit,
13:53 and something that has to operate
13:55 at maximum possible resource utilization efficiency.
13:59 If you think of it as that perspective,
14:01 he sees that this is not optimal.
14:03 And so the whole process of war and rejuvenation
14:06 is actually creative destruction,
14:08 where you are trying to optimize the entire resource utilization
14:12 pattern.
14:13 So that's just thought on top of my head,
14:17 based on what Aika said.
14:19 I think in terms of particular business lessons,
14:24 it is very interesting to see the Mahabharata as--
14:28 I mean, my competence is strategic management
14:31 in international business, when it comes to the business side
14:34 of things.
14:34 So I always see the Mahabharata as a battle
14:38 for resource management.
14:39 Control over economic resources, which
14:43 then become a source of power, which I know is probably very
14:45 Marxist in nature, but hey, that's how it is.
14:49 So from that perspective, I think
14:51 it is possible to take away a lot of competitive lessons
14:55 in terms of, again, coming back to my favorite keyword here,
15:00 efficiency, utilization efficiency,
15:02 coming back to issues like can the small take on the big,
15:07 coming back to issues even like how do you understand value
15:11 creation and distribution of created value, which I think
15:16 is a very important topic for us in a corporate context.
15:19 So you have this whole process that you bring in,
15:22 but then how do you distribute the value that is then
15:24 generated as a result of that?
15:27 And so I think many lessons are possible.
15:31 But here, I will admit my bias when
15:33 I say many lessons are possible if you
15:35 are willing to look at it from a rationalist perspective
15:38 rather than only a spiritual perspective.
15:41 I'm not discounting the spiritual lessons.
15:43 We get there.
15:44 But I'm saying there are a lot of economic efficiency value
15:49 maximization perspectives that we
15:50 can get if we are willing to take a rational approach
15:53 to events as history.
15:55 Can you recount three stories?
15:58 Can you recount three episodes or stories
16:00 for us which bear out the best lessons for you
16:03 from a business management perspective?
16:05 Oh my god, she's putting me on the line here, isn't she?
16:08 Three stories from a management perspective.
16:11 OK, since this is about leaders, let me start off there.
16:17 Succession issues, the whole idea of should
16:21 could the entire world-- if we think of war
16:23 as a negative thing that happened and not just
16:25 a competition-- could war have been averted
16:28 if Dhritarashtra had actually resigned from his post
16:31 as CEO/king and let the next line of leadership
16:35 come up instead?
16:36 Might it?
16:37 Yes, possibly.
16:38 Then that brings us to the second--
16:40 And who would that be?
16:41 Because the whole war was about who should be the next leader.
16:45 Exactly.
16:46 So that brings us to the next question.
16:48 What are you going to use as your measuring
16:50 characteristic of a leader?
16:52 Are you going to use competencies, skills,
16:57 or are you going to use legacy?
17:01 What are the parameters you use to define leadership?
17:04 In my personal view, Duryodhan was an extremely competent
17:08 leader, extremely, extremely competent.
17:11 I know that probably myth history
17:12 portrays him in a very dark way on many occasions.
17:16 But let's think about it.
17:17 Let's think about the instance when--
17:19 we say the war began.
17:20 Why?
17:21 Because Krishna went to Duryodhan and said,
17:23 please give the Pandavas at least five villages for them
17:26 to rule.
17:27 And he says, sorry, you're not getting five needle
17:30 points of land.
17:32 Why?
17:32 Well, one way of interpreting it is
17:35 that he is a power-obsessed maniac who is not
17:37 willing to cede any power.
17:39 Another way of interpreting it is to say that, boss,
17:43 you had half a kingdom.
17:45 You had an entire kingdom.
17:46 You had an empire, which you gambled away.
17:50 What does that say about your competency
17:52 to be a leader, a CEO, a king?
17:56 I am sorry I am not giving you any resources to work with,
17:59 because I do not think you have the competency
18:01 to handle those resources.
18:03 And that is very different from saying,
18:05 I'm not giving it to you because I don't like your face.
18:08 So that would be a second thing.
18:10 When do you let go as a leader?
18:12 What values do you seek in a leader
18:14 when you are looking at succession?
18:17 And then, of course, we get to the whole issue of,
18:20 for whom are you trying to use these resources
18:24 and generate value?
18:25 Is it personal gain?
18:27 Is it because you are on a hubris trip
18:29 where you want to be a leader?
18:31 Or is it because you actually take
18:33 into account your stakeholders and see what permutation
18:36 and combination, what are the competencies you can bring
18:39 to bear on those resources to actually generate value
18:43 for a broader set of stakeholders?
18:44 And which, in this case, are the characters
18:48 we actually never talk about in the Mahabharata,
18:49 the common people.
18:51 You know, it's like Mahabharata is full of all these kings
18:54 and warriors and queens who have their own agendas,
18:57 but hey, they are kings of something.
19:00 They are queens of something.
19:01 They have a duty, sort of,
19:05 they have a duty in corporate governance terms.
19:09 They have something they owe their stakeholders.
19:12 Is that actually being maximized?
19:15 So, yeah, I think those would be my three takeaways.
19:18 - So, so I see it.
19:24 So here's how I see it.
19:29 And again, like I said, they're just lessons to be learned.
19:32 I don't think there's any perfect solution there that exists.
19:35 But one of them is about managing your people and your team.
19:41 So when Duryodhana decided that everybody
19:46 was going to fight on his side,
19:49 because he was paying their salaries,
19:50 the level of awareness of saying that,
19:54 dude, your chief of staff, your general,
19:58 wasn't going to kill one enemy soldier, right?
20:02 You had, in all your army,
20:05 you actually had just one person
20:06 who was fighting your cause.
20:08 So, you know, in the classic situational leadership grid
20:10 of M1, M2, M3, and M4,
20:13 you actually had just one person who was in M4,
20:15 which was Karan, willing and able.
20:18 You didn't deploy him because you couldn't handle
20:20 the politics of your chairman.
20:22 That's Abhishek saying, I don't want this, I don't want that.
20:24 But you're the CEO, you're sitting there,
20:26 you know what's good for business.
20:28 And yet you choose to not deploy, right?
20:32 And frankly, by the time you actually got to deploying,
20:34 Karan-- - There, at least you had
20:35 a CEO in Pandav, there was no CEO only, do you agree?
20:38 There was no CEO in the Pandav.
20:40 They only had a McKinsey consultant in Krishna.
20:42 - It's not clear.
20:43 - I said, she's talking about Kauravs.
20:49 Kauravs certainly had a leader in Duryodhana.
20:51 But the Pandavs didn't have a leader only.
20:55 They only had a McKinsey consultant in Krishna.
20:57 - Four by fours and three by threes.
21:01 - They were just going by what the consultant was saying.
21:03 - You know, actually I love that analogy,
21:05 because that's my other favorite incident about this.
21:08 Yudhishthir knew that, and look at the level
21:11 of self-awareness of the leader in that sense.
21:13 He knew he wasn't the most popular person.
21:15 He knew he had an army, he was the underdog.
21:17 He had a smaller army, lesser resources.
21:20 He knew that he was personally very easily,
21:25 very impulsive, very easily angered.
21:29 So he had two choices.
21:30 He could either work on himself and say that,
21:33 you know, I need to get myself to become better.
21:36 But look at the smartness of that.
21:38 So he walked up to Krishna and said,
21:40 be my coach, be my chief strategist,
21:43 and help me through this,
21:45 knowing that Krishna would pull this off for him,
21:47 with complete awareness, strategic awareness,
21:51 that he was the one who was going to be king.
21:54 So to me, the fact that Yudhishthir wasn't an able leader,
21:59 or not a leader at all,
22:00 and how he turned it to his advantage,
22:03 in the sense of bringing in a fabulous coach,
22:08 excellent strategist, and democratizing power.
22:12 So, that was my other favorite incident.
22:16 - So is strategy the most important thing then?
22:19 You know, essentially, the story about Krishna
22:23 and Duryodhana and Arjuna, on either side,
22:26 one on the side of the head and one at the feet,
22:30 and Krishna asks, what do you want before the war?
22:33 And Duryodhana says, I want the Yadav Sena,
22:36 and Arjuna says, well, I'm okay with just you.
22:40 So it's really the strategic choice that,
22:43 in fact, Duryodhana had the choice,
22:48 and he just made a bad strategic choice
22:50 by choosing Yadav Sena,
22:52 because that was regarded as the best,
22:55 and he said, (speaking in foreign language)
22:57 but it turned the other way.
22:58 - So why did Duryodhana choose Yadav Sena and not Krishna?
23:05 - Because he already had appointed a McKinsey consultant
23:08 in the form of Shakuni.
23:09 He had hired Shakuni for his consultancy,
23:13 and that's why Shakuni advised him
23:16 that go and get Yadav Sena, don't get another consultant,
23:19 I'm already there.
23:20 So you have to choose the right mentor,
23:22 and I think what Pandavas chose
23:27 was under-19 cricket team of India,
23:29 which went to Australia with Rahul Dravid as a coach.
23:33 So I will call Rahul Dravid rather than McKinsey for Krishna,
23:38 and both of them have a lot of similarity.
23:40 So clearly, you have to choose your coach correctly.
23:46 If you end up with Shakuni, with resources,
23:48 you will end up in results like Kaurava,
23:52 and if you choose Rahul Dravid,
23:54 even with resources of under-19 cricket team,
23:57 you'll go and win the World Cup, dominating everyone.
24:01 (audience member speaks indistinctly)
24:04 - Your favorite story and lesson.
24:07 - Sorry?
24:08 - Your favorite story and lesson.
24:09 - Story on?
24:10 - Your favorite Mahabharata story and lesson.
24:13 - Yeah, but the--
24:16 - (speaks in foreign language)
24:17 Don't tell me.
24:18 (all laugh)
24:20 - See, there is no, like I said,
24:22 I'm just going back to my previous,
24:25 (speaks in foreign language)
24:27 So I don't think I look at all these epics
24:29 as something that is so overpowering,
24:33 and I appreciate the way you people are looking at it,
24:35 and I'm wondering what Krishna and Arjun,
24:38 if they are listening to this,
24:39 would be thinking about all this.
24:40 Did they really envisage all this,
24:42 and the dissection that we are doing on their strategies?
24:45 I think it just came along the way,
24:47 and they did things that they did.
24:50 It's good for a debate to kind of--
24:52 (all laugh)
24:53 - I love that, it's time to close the discussion.
24:56 On this note, may I just add in a lighter vein?
24:59 There's actually this,
25:01 to sort of take on from what you've just said,
25:04 there's actually this sort of scene in the Mahabharata
25:07 which takes place much after the war,
25:09 when Arjuna goes back to Krishna,
25:12 and he's referring to the Bhagavad Gita,
25:15 and he's like,
25:17 (speaks in foreign language)
25:21 It really resonated with me,
25:22 but I remember some of it,
25:24 and I don't remember some of it,
25:25 and I'm paraphrasing very crudely here,
25:28 but before Krishna tries to recap his first response,
25:30 I'm, (speaks in foreign language)
25:33 I don't really remember what I said,
25:34 and then he tries and reconstructs--
25:37 - Where is this reference?
25:40 - It's actually there in the Mahabharata,
25:41 it takes place post-hawk, after the battle,
25:44 after Yudhishthira has been once again appointed
25:47 as emperor of the realm,
25:49 and they've had that whole thing.
25:51 There's this very casual afternoon,
25:53 when Arjuna is like,
25:54 you told me a lot of things,
25:57 I think I grasped some of it,
25:58 I'm not very clear on the concepts,
26:00 do you care to sort of elaborate again?
26:02 And he's like,
26:03 I told you what I told you to get the job done,
26:05 now please don't ask me what I told you then.
26:07 So, I'm sorry,
26:07 this is just a very light-hearted comment
26:09 that comes on from what you just said.
26:11 - That pretty much demolishes Mahabharata
26:13 as also the conversation--
26:14 - I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I apologize.
26:16 - Surely I didn't sign up for this panel.
26:19 (laughs)
26:21 - Okay, any concluding thoughts?
26:24 - I think there's just one more thing.
26:26 Is this not a question, Shalini?
26:28 - Yeah, if you want a mic.
26:30 - So I think there's just one more aspect of leadership,
26:34 particularly that I want to highlight,
26:37 which is irrespective of whether you're the Brahma,
26:38 the Vishnu, or the Mahesh,
26:39 irrespective of what stage of the organizational journey
26:43 you're coming in,
26:44 irrespective of the challenges that are ahead of you,
26:46 if there's one thing that differentiates
26:51 a leader or makes a visionary leader,
26:54 it's actually establishment of purpose.
26:57 And the reason I like that is because,
26:59 think about it,
26:59 (speaks in foreign language)
27:02 They were fighting (speaks in foreign language)
27:07 What was Yudhishthir's army fighting for?
27:11 (speaks in foreign language)
27:14 Eventually, it was just a battle
27:15 between two warring cousin families.
27:19 But that establishment of purpose,
27:22 which allows you to bring in that sort of leadership
27:25 where people will lay down their lives for you.
27:27 Ramayana, Ravana's army was fighting
27:31 to avenge the honor of a wronged woman,
27:34 which is a very lofty purpose, no doubt.
27:37 But Rama's army was fighting for good over evil.
27:41 Barack Obama, in his first election,
27:47 his competitor, John McCain,
27:51 we really don't even remember
27:53 who his first presidential competitor was,
27:56 was promising economic reforms, democracy,
27:59 manufacturing, local jobs, et cetera, et cetera.
28:02 I'm sure that is what Barack Obama
28:03 was also promising transactionally.
28:05 But he was about, yes, we can.
28:08 So the purpose was about hope.
28:11 And so to me, that is the other very key lesson
28:14 that I take away from Mahabharata,
28:17 which is that irrespective of the kind of leader you are,
28:20 there are only two things that really make a difference.
28:22 One, how aware you are of your flaws and strengths,
28:27 and therefore, what are you going to play to?
28:30 And the other is if you're able to establish
28:33 a purpose that's larger than,
28:36 where the whole is greater than some parts.
28:39 So really just those two.
28:40 - Sure, any questions?
28:42 (audience members chattering)
28:46 - Two beautiful ladies for this entertaining,
28:57 somewhat futile discussion, I'm sorry.
29:01 But thank you, all of you, for joining us today.
29:06 I really enjoyed the three discussions
29:12 that I moderated and also the other discussions earlier on.
29:16 And let's hit the bar.
29:18 Thank you.
29:19 - Thank you so much, Mahalakshmi.
29:22 Thank you to all our panelists
29:23 for that very interesting perspective this evening.
29:25 (upbeat music)
29:28 (upbeat music)

Recommended