Jon Confronts Daenerys Drogon Melts Iron Throne and Flies away holding his mother!
I'm pretty sure D&D wrote the end without even asking George R. R. Martin what the main idea of the whole GOT was (How to rule). So, let me see if I got that right. You (Dany) get to witness your first child’s death from the Night King. Then you get to see your other kid die by the allies of a Lanister! You watch your best friend be beheaded by a soldier of a Lanister and the other soldiers (of a Lanister) do nothing. Then those who thought that their Queen was a pr0stitut3 seek asylum to her castle, without thinking of joining the free people such as 'The Unsullied'. Finally, because D&D decided that (Dany) you have to kill the enemy (all of the enemy people! Remember what happened in all of the major wars? Has anybody cheered watching 'Fury') they call you Mad Queen and the one who loves you slains you! At the end the traitor (three times) becomes Hand of the King! The other Traitor (Sansa) questions the New King but still becomes Queen of the North. The lover and Rightful King gets exiled to the North to face his remorse (this was kind of right). So, the Lanisters (one of them caused most of the trouble) get to rule again! Finally, the last child of the Queen that won single-handed the battle of Kings Landing and the one (Drogon) that took part in all the major battles leaves heartbroken with his mother seemingly dead! To summarize, Martin is a fan of Niccolo Machiavelli. He knows that "a new prince (or Queen) cannot avoid the reputation for cruelty. This is because new states are full of dangers". Therefore, he should write that Daenerys is NOT DEAD and reunite her with Jon. Finally, the new king has no proper army, no dragons and he may be respected but not feared! He won't last 10 years (isn't that what Tyrion predicted?). This is what happens when you sell a piece of art to some people that know nothing but pay you a fortune and you leave them fill the last pages of our masterpiece! I would say: no lesson learned from J. R. R. Tolien!
I'm pretty sure D&D wrote the end without even asking George R. R. Martin what the main idea of the whole GOT was (How to rule). So, let me see if I got that right. You (Dany) get to witness your first child’s death from the Night King. Then you get to see your other kid die by the allies of a Lanister! You watch your best friend be beheaded by a soldier of a Lanister and the other soldiers (of a Lanister) do nothing. Then those who thought that their Queen was a pr0stitut3 seek asylum to her castle, without thinking of joining the free people such as 'The Unsullied'. Finally, because D&D decided that (Dany) you have to kill the enemy (all of the enemy people! Remember what happened in all of the major wars? Has anybody cheered watching 'Fury') they call you Mad Queen and the one who loves you slains you! At the end the traitor (three times) becomes Hand of the King! The other Traitor (Sansa) questions the New King but still becomes Queen of the North. The lover and Rightful King gets exiled to the North to face his remorse (this was kind of right). So, the Lanisters (one of them caused most of the trouble) get to rule again! Finally, the last child of the Queen that won single-handed the battle of Kings Landing and the one (Drogon) that took part in all the major battles leaves heartbroken with his mother seemingly dead! To summarize, Martin is a fan of Niccolo Machiavelli. He knows that "a new prince (or Queen) cannot avoid the reputation for cruelty. This is because new states are full of dangers". Therefore, he should write that Daenerys is NOT DEAD and reunite her with Jon. Finally, the new king has no proper army, no dragons and he may be respected but not feared! He won't last 10 years (isn't that what Tyrion predicted?). This is what happens when you sell a piece of art to some people that know nothing but pay you a fortune and you leave them fill the last pages of our masterpiece! I would say: no lesson learned from J. R. R. Tolien!
Category
✨
People