Birth of Leopold - Delayed Cord Clamping Lotus Birth - Water Birth - BBt 24
- 6 years ago
When we decided on a home birthing experience with Leopold (even though we ended up in a hotel), we became aware of the option of pricing non-severance with the umbilical cord (delayed cord cutting after birth, , hereby leaving the placenta attached and allowing it to nourish the infant until it closes itself off naturally in 3-10 days. This price is more often known as a lotus birth. Leopolds birth was the first time we had ever heard of this option and we were intrigued to learn more. After our first meeting with Tarrin, our midwife, we did some additional research and it seemed like the right thing to do for this birthing experience. We think a lotus birth is a big commitment that isnt right for everyone, but we certainly felt ready to experience it alongside Leo.\r
\r
During our research, we discovered that, much like home birth, considering a lotus birth is an option met with much criticism and polarity. On one side, many physicians believe that lotus birth is an invitation for infection. It has been said that the placenta can be viewed as a wound with a large surface area of dead tissue with the umbilical cord ing as a bridge to transport beria to your baby. On the other end of the spectrum, midwives and natural parents alike believe the nutritional, spiritual and bonding aspects are necessary for allowing continued infant support while the cord severs itself through the natural drying process. No matter what side you take, one thing is for certain: there simply is not enough research to support either side or confirm the correctness of either claim. We find this lack of research interesting since the history of human non-severance must have been around since the beginning of man-kind. Why is this price only now being explored as an area of scientific study?\r
\r
In our case and after getting the information we needed from our midwife, we felt a lotus birth was naturally important and would add to the beauty of our experience. After Leopold was born, our midwife showed us how to care for his placenta and she helped us understand what was needed for sanitation and care.\r
\r
Now that Leopold is 24 months old, we have to wonder what this option has truly given him. He is an incredibly strong and bright child that has consistently been surpassing every milestone. We think that embracing the lotus option in conjunction with breastfeeding has given him the best start possible to his life. It has been our understanding that some lotus birthers have chosen to ingest the placenta as well, however we passed on this price of placentophagy in lieu of planting it under the fig tree at our new home. We think the placenta will serve an indirect purpose with its special meaning under the fig tree for many years to come.\r
\r
Given this information, our footage and our slideshow, what are your opinions and experiences regarding lotus birth? Have you opted for a lotus birth? Would you do it again? Why or why not? Thank you so much for your continued support!\r
\r
Join us on:\r
Facebook: \r
Instagram: \r
Twitter: \r
Google+:
\r
During our research, we discovered that, much like home birth, considering a lotus birth is an option met with much criticism and polarity. On one side, many physicians believe that lotus birth is an invitation for infection. It has been said that the placenta can be viewed as a wound with a large surface area of dead tissue with the umbilical cord ing as a bridge to transport beria to your baby. On the other end of the spectrum, midwives and natural parents alike believe the nutritional, spiritual and bonding aspects are necessary for allowing continued infant support while the cord severs itself through the natural drying process. No matter what side you take, one thing is for certain: there simply is not enough research to support either side or confirm the correctness of either claim. We find this lack of research interesting since the history of human non-severance must have been around since the beginning of man-kind. Why is this price only now being explored as an area of scientific study?\r
\r
In our case and after getting the information we needed from our midwife, we felt a lotus birth was naturally important and would add to the beauty of our experience. After Leopold was born, our midwife showed us how to care for his placenta and she helped us understand what was needed for sanitation and care.\r
\r
Now that Leopold is 24 months old, we have to wonder what this option has truly given him. He is an incredibly strong and bright child that has consistently been surpassing every milestone. We think that embracing the lotus option in conjunction with breastfeeding has given him the best start possible to his life. It has been our understanding that some lotus birthers have chosen to ingest the placenta as well, however we passed on this price of placentophagy in lieu of planting it under the fig tree at our new home. We think the placenta will serve an indirect purpose with its special meaning under the fig tree for many years to come.\r
\r
Given this information, our footage and our slideshow, what are your opinions and experiences regarding lotus birth? Have you opted for a lotus birth? Would you do it again? Why or why not? Thank you so much for your continued support!\r
\r
Join us on:\r
Facebook: \r
Instagram: \r
Twitter: \r
Google+: