Vintage Surf Cincinnati Commercial
Fourth child on the way, won't live another day
Fetus on the road, with mangled little bones
Little children fly, not a chance to wonder why
Smashed against the ceiling, all their skin burning and peeling
Shards of glass explode, chest and skull now implode
Corpses they've become, and graves will have to be dug
...am I doing this right?
[]Those are common in the US as well.
[]It's worse, I have student loans.
[]Sorta like the clogged nose on double dare that you gotta get the flag out of
[]That is rather disturbing but well done at the same time
[]Sure. Fair point. I'll rephrase. Improper discrimination? Do you know a better word to use in its place?
[]
A lot of people get degrees they shouldn't be getting and then complain when they can't find work.
That's because everyone wants glamorous jobs.
Everyone wants to be the rockstar developer, no one wants to be the guy working in the bowels of the datacenter pulling new fiber and fixing broken servers.
[]Well he likes Zelda, everyone has their own taste i guess X D
Even the hard thugs
[]Unless you're in Italy, the USA is the biggest coffee market and has it down. Seattle, Washington is a huge coffee market. Different coffee shop on every corner in that state. Chicago, Illinois is another. Not fair to critique and have ego.
[]This show was not only a mirror image of my family in the 90s (I'm Hal in tighty whities) but also one of my favorites. I realized along the way that what made the show special was the relationships. Sure they were trashy and embarrassing but mom and dad were very much in love and Reese may be stupid but that were all there for each other and although Family Guy loves to poke fun at her Lois was the matriarch keeping all of her boys functional and together. In my opinion Malcolm's family is a shining example of great parenting and something we can all take inspiration from.
[]They like to keep people nice and coisy warm in camps
[]Mhm interesting
[]so do you think being politically swayed means you have no journalistic integrity?
[]No that's "the bus that couldn't slow down"
[]That's so sweet! :)
[]I guess that would equate to just one Fantastic Eight film
[]Tell that to Giles Corey
[]There are way of greatly improving the specificity of CRISPR and there's constant research on improving it so maybe we will, maybe we won't.
[]I have a kitty like this. Its nice most of the time.
[]Yeah I was about to say.... Trumbo was fantastic
[]/r/jokes
[]EM doc. I think one of the controversies in our field revolves around the idea of an acceptable miss rate for illnesses/injuries. There is a spectrum when ordering diagnostic tests. It goes from order all the tests on everybody and miss nothing to order very little and just diagnose based on history and physical. Obviously, practicing towards the former is expensive and leads to lots of false positives which lead to further, sometimes risky testing like cardiac catheterizations or large number of imaging studies with radiation. Practicing towards the later, of course, leads to missed diagnosis, sometimes with bad outcomes. There are some disease states where I think we've gone to far towards testing everyone without using sense. For example, low risk chest pain - in my observation unit false positive stress tests outnumber true positives. This means cardiac caths which have a nonzero risk of injury to vessels, bleeding, or kidney injury in a patient who really had almost no risk of active heart disease in the first place. But people get nervous about sending them home because if they have a heart attack any time in the next couple months you will get sued and maybe lose, even if their current presentation is from those weights they lifted the other day. There are all sorts of examples of similar processes where we feel obligated to order tests we are 99% sure will be negative. This is unlikely to be cost effective long term
[]He doesn't believe in numbers though
[]You've fallen right into my trap I see. I used psychology to beat you, understand?
[]All these people...
Your boss was right. Stools do promote better posture and are generally better for back issues. Having a back support is detrimental to your back 90% of the time. Sitting on a stool forces you to sit in an upright, active position that is good for your(especially lower) back.
source: years of back issues, solved by never leaning my back against a chair again.
http://dailymotionembedsearch.blogspot.com
Fetus on the road, with mangled little bones
Little children fly, not a chance to wonder why
Smashed against the ceiling, all their skin burning and peeling
Shards of glass explode, chest and skull now implode
Corpses they've become, and graves will have to be dug
...am I doing this right?
[]Those are common in the US as well.
[]It's worse, I have student loans.
[]Sorta like the clogged nose on double dare that you gotta get the flag out of
[]That is rather disturbing but well done at the same time
[]Sure. Fair point. I'll rephrase. Improper discrimination? Do you know a better word to use in its place?
[]
A lot of people get degrees they shouldn't be getting and then complain when they can't find work.
That's because everyone wants glamorous jobs.
Everyone wants to be the rockstar developer, no one wants to be the guy working in the bowels of the datacenter pulling new fiber and fixing broken servers.
[]Well he likes Zelda, everyone has their own taste i guess X D
Even the hard thugs
[]Unless you're in Italy, the USA is the biggest coffee market and has it down. Seattle, Washington is a huge coffee market. Different coffee shop on every corner in that state. Chicago, Illinois is another. Not fair to critique and have ego.
[]This show was not only a mirror image of my family in the 90s (I'm Hal in tighty whities) but also one of my favorites. I realized along the way that what made the show special was the relationships. Sure they were trashy and embarrassing but mom and dad were very much in love and Reese may be stupid but that were all there for each other and although Family Guy loves to poke fun at her Lois was the matriarch keeping all of her boys functional and together. In my opinion Malcolm's family is a shining example of great parenting and something we can all take inspiration from.
[]They like to keep people nice and coisy warm in camps
[]Mhm interesting
[]so do you think being politically swayed means you have no journalistic integrity?
[]No that's "the bus that couldn't slow down"
[]That's so sweet! :)
[]I guess that would equate to just one Fantastic Eight film
[]Tell that to Giles Corey
[]There are way of greatly improving the specificity of CRISPR and there's constant research on improving it so maybe we will, maybe we won't.
[]I have a kitty like this. Its nice most of the time.
[]Yeah I was about to say.... Trumbo was fantastic
[]/r/jokes
[]EM doc. I think one of the controversies in our field revolves around the idea of an acceptable miss rate for illnesses/injuries. There is a spectrum when ordering diagnostic tests. It goes from order all the tests on everybody and miss nothing to order very little and just diagnose based on history and physical. Obviously, practicing towards the former is expensive and leads to lots of false positives which lead to further, sometimes risky testing like cardiac catheterizations or large number of imaging studies with radiation. Practicing towards the later, of course, leads to missed diagnosis, sometimes with bad outcomes. There are some disease states where I think we've gone to far towards testing everyone without using sense. For example, low risk chest pain - in my observation unit false positive stress tests outnumber true positives. This means cardiac caths which have a nonzero risk of injury to vessels, bleeding, or kidney injury in a patient who really had almost no risk of active heart disease in the first place. But people get nervous about sending them home because if they have a heart attack any time in the next couple months you will get sued and maybe lose, even if their current presentation is from those weights they lifted the other day. There are all sorts of examples of similar processes where we feel obligated to order tests we are 99% sure will be negative. This is unlikely to be cost effective long term
[]He doesn't believe in numbers though
[]You've fallen right into my trap I see. I used psychology to beat you, understand?
[]All these people...
Your boss was right. Stools do promote better posture and are generally better for back issues. Having a back support is detrimental to your back 90% of the time. Sitting on a stool forces you to sit in an upright, active position that is good for your(especially lower) back.
source: years of back issues, solved by never leaning my back against a chair again.
http://dailymotionembedsearch.blogspot.com
Category
🎥
Short film